Links Jonathan M, Schwartz Brian S, Lin Sen, Kanarek Norma, Mitrani-Reiser Judith, Sell Tara Kirk, Watson Crystal R, Ward Doug, Slemp Cathy, Burhans Robert, Gill Kimberly, Igusa Tak, Zhao Xilei, Aguirre Benigno, Trainor Joseph, Nigg Joanne, Inglesby Thomas, Carbone Eric, Kendra James M
1Department of Environmental Health and Engineering,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Baltimore,Maryland.
3Department of Civil Engineering,Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering,Baltimore,Maryland.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Feb;12(1):127-137. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.39. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Policy-makers and practitioners have a need to assess community resilience in disasters. Prior efforts conflated resilience with community functioning, combined resistance and recovery (the components of resilience), and relied on a static model for what is inherently a dynamic process. We sought to develop linked conceptual and computational models of community functioning and resilience after a disaster.
We developed a system dynamics computational model that predicts community functioning after a disaster. The computational model outputted the time course of community functioning before, during, and after a disaster, which was used to calculate resistance, recovery, and resilience for all US counties.
The conceptual model explicitly separated resilience from community functioning and identified all key components for each, which were translated into a system dynamics computational model with connections and feedbacks. The components were represented by publicly available measures at the county level. Baseline community functioning, resistance, recovery, and resilience evidenced a range of values and geographic clustering, consistent with hypotheses based on the disaster literature.
The work is transparent, motivates ongoing refinements, and identifies areas for improved measurements. After validation, such a model can be used to identify effective investments to enhance community resilience. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:127-137).
政策制定者和从业者需要评估社区在灾难中的恢复力。先前的研究将恢复力与社区功能混为一谈,将抵抗力和恢复力(恢复力的组成部分)合并,并依赖于一个静态模型来描述本质上是动态的过程。我们试图构建灾难后社区功能和恢复力的关联概念模型和计算模型。
我们开发了一个系统动力学计算模型,用于预测灾难后的社区功能。该计算模型输出了灾难前、灾难期间和灾难后的社区功能随时间变化的过程,用于计算美国所有县的抵抗力、恢复力和恢复力。
概念模型明确将恢复力与社区功能区分开来,并确定了两者的所有关键组成部分,这些组成部分被转化为一个具有联系和反馈的系统动力学计算模型。这些组成部分由县级公开可用的指标表示。基线社区功能、抵抗力、恢复力和恢复力呈现出一系列数值和地理聚类,与基于灾难文献的假设一致。
这项工作具有透明度,促使不断完善,并确定了改进测量的领域。经过验证后,这样的模型可用于确定有效的投资,以增强社区恢复力。(《灾难医学与公共卫生防范》。2018年;12:127 - 137)