Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências, CE3C-Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Nov;119(5):295-301. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2017.33. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Bacteria sometimes cooperate with co-inhabiting cells. Pathogenic bacteria, for example, often produce and excrete virulence factors, eventually benefitting both producer and non-producer cells. The role of social interactions involving antibiotic resistance, however, has been more elusive. Enzymes that inactivate β-lactam antibiotics such as ampicillin or penicillin (β-lactamases) are good candidates as public goods. Nonetheless, it has been claimed that bacteria harbouring plasmids of natural origin coding for β-lactamase almost do not protect sensitive bacteria. This does not fit with the fact that ampicillin-sensitive bacteria can be isolated from subjects undergoing ampicillin treatment. We hypothesised that there are two non-exclusive explanations for the discrepancy between previous works: (1) the range of values of demographic conditions (such as initial strain frequency, initial total cell density or habitat structure) has not been broad enough to include most scenarios, or (2) there are interactions between some of these factors. We performed experiments with Escherichia coli bacterial cells to measure the degree of protection of sensitive cells when co-cultured with cells harbouring RP4, R16a or the R1 plasmids, all of natural origin and coding for β-lactamases, and in presence of ampicillin. In these co-cultures, performed in structured and non-structured environments, both the initial total cell density and the initial frequency of sensitive cells spanned four orders of magnitude. We found protection of sensitive cells in 63% of tested conditions. All factors (plasmid, structure, frequency and density) significantly affect levels of protection. Moreover, all factors interact, with interactions revealing large or very large effect sizes.
细菌有时会与共存细胞合作。例如,致病性细菌通常会产生和分泌毒力因子,最终使生产者和非生产者细胞都受益。然而,涉及抗生素耐药性的社会相互作用的作用一直更加难以捉摸。能够使青霉素类抗生素(如氨苄青霉素或青霉素)失活的酶(β-内酰胺酶)是公共物品的良好候选物。尽管如此,有人声称,天然来源编码β-内酰胺酶的质粒的细菌几乎不能保护敏感细菌。这与氨苄青霉素敏感细菌可以从接受氨苄青霉素治疗的患者中分离出来的事实不符。我们假设,对于先前的工作存在两种非排他性的解释:(1)人口统计学条件(如初始菌株频率、初始总细胞密度或栖息地结构)的变化范围不够广泛,无法包含大多数情况,或者(2)这些因素之间存在相互作用。我们使用大肠杆菌细菌细胞进行实验,以测量当与携带自然来源且编码β-内酰胺酶的 RP4、R16a 或 R1 质粒的细胞共培养时,敏感细胞的保护程度,同时存在氨苄青霉素。在这些共培养物中,在结构化和非结构化环境中进行,初始总细胞密度和敏感细胞的初始频率跨越了四个数量级。我们发现,在 63%的测试条件下,敏感细胞得到了保护。所有因素(质粒、结构、频率和密度)都显著影响保护水平。此外,所有因素相互作用,相互作用揭示了大或非常大的效应大小。