Recinto Christine, Efthemeou Theodore, Boffelli P Tony, Navalta James W
Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Jul 1;10(4):506-514. doi: 10.70252/EHDR7442. eCollection 2017.
Nasal and oral exclusive breathing modes have benefits and drawbacks during submaximal exercise. It is unknown whether these responses would extend to anaerobic work performed at high intensity. Nine individuals (males N = 7, females N = 2) performed a standard Wingate Anaerobic cycle test on a cycle ergometer under nose (N) and mouth (M) only respiratory conditions, performed in a counterbalanced order. A 2 (condition: nose, mouth) × 6 (time: 0-5 sec, 5-10 sec, 10-15 sec, 15-20 sec, 20-25 sec, 25-30 sec) repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the data with significance accepted at the p<0.05 level. No differences between breathing mode were observed for any power output or performance measures associated with the Wingate Anaerobic cycle test. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was significantly higher in the oral respiration condition from 10 seconds to 25 seconds during the test (p<0.05). On the other hand, heart rate (HR) in the nasal condition was significantly greater during the final two time intervals (p<0.05). Nasal breathing was effective in reducing hyperventilation as RER remained below 1.0. However, elevated HR with nasal breathing indicates increased cardiovascular stress associated with this mode. As breathing mode does not affect power output or performance measures during completion of a high-intensity anaerobic test, preference of the participant should be the determining factor if a choice is available.
在次最大运动期间,鼻腔和口腔单独呼吸模式各有优缺点。目前尚不清楚这些反应是否会延伸至高强度的无氧运动。九名受试者(男性7名,女性2名)在自行车测力计上进行标准的温盖特无氧自行车测试,测试时分别采用仅通过鼻腔(N)和仅通过口腔(M)的呼吸条件,两种条件以平衡顺序进行。采用2(条件:鼻腔、口腔)×6(时间:0 - 5秒、5 - 10秒、10 - 15秒、15 - 20秒、20 - 25秒、25 - 30秒)重复测量方差分析来分析数据,显著性水平设定为p<0.05。在与温盖特无氧自行车测试相关的任何功率输出或性能指标方面,未观察到呼吸模式之间存在差异。在测试期间,从10秒到25秒,口腔呼吸条件下的呼吸交换率(RER)显著更高(p<0.05)。另一方面,在最后两个时间间隔内,鼻腔呼吸条件下的心率(HR)显著更高(p<0.05)。由于RER保持在1.0以下,鼻腔呼吸在减少过度通气方面是有效的。然而,鼻腔呼吸时升高的心率表明与该模式相关的心血管压力增加。由于在完成高强度无氧测试期间呼吸模式不影响功率输出或性能指标,如果可以选择,参与者的偏好应是决定因素。