Janowitz Tobias, Williams Edward H, Marshall Andrea, Ainsworth Nicola, Thomas Peter B, Sammut Stephen J, Shepherd Scott, White Jeff, Mark Patrick B, Lynch Andy G, Jodrell Duncan I, Tavaré Simon, Earl Helena
Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2798-2805. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7578. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
Purpose The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for carboplatin chemotherapy dosing; however, the best method to estimate GFR in patients with cancer is unknown. We identify the most accurate and least biased method. Methods We obtained data on age, sex, height, weight, serum creatinine concentrations, and results for GFR from chromium-51 (Cr) EDTA excretion measurements (Cr-EDTA GFR) from white patients ≥ 18 years of age with histologically confirmed cancer diagnoses at the Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom. We developed a new multivariable linear model for GFR using statistical regression analysis. Cr-EDTA GFR was compared with the estimated GFR (eGFR) from seven published models and our new model, using the statistics root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) and median residual and on an internal and external validation data set. We performed a comparison of carboplatin dosing accuracy on the basis of an absolute percentage error > 20%. Results Between August 2006 and January 2013, data from 2,471 patients were obtained. The new model improved the eGFR accuracy (RMSE, 15.00 mL/min; 95% CI, 14.12 to 16.00 mL/min) compared with all published models. Body surface area (BSA)-adjusted chronic kidney disease epidemiology (CKD-EPI) was the most accurate published model for eGFR (RMSE, 16.30 mL/min; 95% CI, 15.34 to 17.38 mL/min) for the internal validation set. Importantly, the new model reduced the fraction of patients with a carboplatin dose absolute percentage error > 20% to 14.17% in contrast to 18.62% for the BSA-adjusted CKD-EPI and 25.51% for the Cockcroft-Gault formula. The results were externally validated. Conclusion In a large data set from patients with cancer, BSA-adjusted CKD-EPI is the most accurate published model to predict GFR. The new model improves this estimation and may present a new standard of care.
目的 肾小球滤过率(GFR)对于卡铂化疗给药至关重要;然而,癌症患者中估算GFR的最佳方法尚不清楚。我们确定最准确且偏差最小的方法。方法 我们获取了来自英国剑桥大学医院国民保健服务信托基金的年龄、性别、身高、体重、血清肌酐浓度以及通过铬-51(Cr)乙二胺四乙酸排泄测量(Cr-EDTA GFR)得出的GFR结果的数据,这些数据来自年龄≥18岁、经组织学确诊患有癌症的白人患者。我们使用统计回归分析开发了一种新的GFR多变量线性模型。使用均方根误差(RMSE)和中位数残差统计量,在内部和外部验证数据集上,将Cr-EDTA GFR与来自七个已发表模型以及我们的新模型的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)进行比较。我们基于绝对百分比误差>20%对卡铂给药准确性进行了比较。结果 在2006年8月至2013年1月期间,获取了2471例患者的数据。与所有已发表模型相比,新模型提高了eGFR准确性(RMSE,15.00 mL/分钟;95%置信区间,14.12至16.00 mL/分钟)。对于内部验证集,体表面积(BSA)校正的慢性肾脏病流行病学(CKD-EPI)模型是已发表的最准确的eGFR模型(RMSE,16.30 mL/分钟;95%置信区间,15.34至17.38 mL/分钟)。重要的是,新模型将卡铂剂量绝对百分比误差>20%的患者比例降至14.17%,相比之下,BSA校正的CKD-EPI模型为18.62%,Cockcroft-Gault公式为25.51%。结果得到了外部验证。结论 在来自癌症患者的大型数据集中,BSA校正的CKD-EPI是已发表的预测GFR最准确的模型。新模型改进了这种估算,可能代表一种新的护理标准。