Suppr超能文献

再生农业的必要性。

The imperative for regenerative agriculture.

出版信息

Sci Prog. 2017 Mar 1;100(1):80-129. doi: 10.3184/003685017X14876775256165.

Abstract

A review is made of the current state of agriculture, emphasising issues of soil erosion and dependence on fossil fuels, in regard to achieving food security for a relentlessly enlarging global population. Soil has been described as "the fragile, living skin of the Earth", and yet both its aliveness and fragility have all too often been ignored in the expansion of agriculture across the face of the globe. Since it is a pivotal component in a global nexus of soil-water-air-energy, how we treat the soil can impact massively on climate change - with either beneficial or detrimental consequences, depending on whether the soil is preserved or degraded. Regenerative agriculture has at its core the intention to improve the health of soil or to restore highly degraded soil, which symbiotically enhances the quality of water, vegetation and land-productivity. By using methods of regenerative agriculture, it is possible not only to increase the amount of soil organic carbon (SOC) in existing soils, but to build new soil. This has the effect of drawing down carbon from the atmosphere, while simultaneously improving soil structure and soil health, soil fertility and crop yields, water retention and aquifer recharge - thus ameliorating both flooding and drought, and also the erosion of further soil, since runoff is reduced. Since food production on a more local scale is found to preserve the soil and its quality, urban food production should be seen as a significant potential contributor to regenerative agriculture in the future, so long as the methods employed are themselves 'regenerative'. If localisation is to become a dominant strategy for dealing with a vastly reduced use of fossil fuels, and preserving soil quality - with increased food production in towns and cities - it will be necessary to incorporate integrated ('systems') design approaches such as permaculture and the circular economy (which minimise and repurpose 'waste') within the existing urban infrastructure. In addition to growing food in urban space, such actions as draught-proofing and thermally insulating existing building stock, and living/ working on a more local scale, would serve well to cut our overall energy consumption. In order to curb our use of fossil fuels, methods for reducing overall energy use must be considered at least equally important to expanding low-carbon energy production. In synopsis, it is clear that only by moving from the current linear, 'take, make, dispose (waste-creation)' model for resource-consumption, to the systemic, circular alternative of 'reduce, reuse, recycle, regenerate', are we likely to meet demands for future generations.

摘要

本文综述了农业的现状,重点讨论了在全球人口不断增长的情况下,实现粮食安全所面临的土壤侵蚀和对化石燃料的依赖问题。土壤被描述为“地球脆弱的生命之肤”,然而,在全球范围内农业扩张的过程中,土壤的生命力和脆弱性往往被忽视。由于土壤是土壤-水-气-能全球网络的关键组成部分,我们对待土壤的方式会对气候变化产生巨大影响——根据土壤是得到保护还是退化,其后果可能是有益的,也可能是有害的。再生农业的核心是改善土壤健康或恢复高度退化的土壤,这可以协同提高水质、植被和土地生产力。通过使用再生农业的方法,不仅可以增加现有土壤中的土壤有机碳 (SOC) 含量,还可以建造新的土壤。这不仅可以从大气中吸收碳,还可以同时改善土壤结构和土壤健康、土壤肥力和作物产量、保水和含水层补给——从而改善洪水和干旱以及进一步的土壤侵蚀,因为径流减少了。由于在较小的范围内生产食物可以保护土壤及其质量,因此城市粮食生产应该被视为未来再生农业的一个重要潜在贡献者,只要所采用的方法本身是“再生的”。如果本地化成为处理化石燃料大量减少和保护土壤质量的主要策略——在城镇增加粮食生产——那么就有必要在现有的城市基础设施中纳入综合(“系统”)设计方法,如永续农业和循环经济(将“废物”最小化和再利用)。除了在城市空间中种植食物外,采取防风和隔热现有建筑存量、在更小的范围内生活/工作等措施,也将有助于大幅减少我们的整体能源消耗。为了减少我们对化石燃料的使用,必须考虑减少整体能源使用的方法,至少与扩大低碳能源生产同等重要。总之,只有从当前线性的“索取、制造、处置(产生废物)”资源消耗模式转变为系统的、循环的替代模式“减少、再利用、再循环、再生”,我们才有可能满足后代的需求。

相似文献

1
The imperative for regenerative agriculture.再生农业的必要性。
Sci Prog. 2017 Mar 1;100(1):80-129. doi: 10.3184/003685017X14876775256165.
4
8
Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security.土壤与农业集约化:保障全球粮食安全
Environ Int. 2019 Nov;132:105078. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105078. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Marketing in the anthropocene: A future agenda for research and practice.人类世的营销:研究与实践的未来议程。
AMS Rev (N Y). 2025;15(1-2):23-47. doi: 10.1007/s13162-025-00300-5. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.微生物拯救生命,减轻痛苦。
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Jan;18(1):e70068. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70068.
10
Chilean public attitudes towards beef production systems.智利民众对牛肉生产体系的态度。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0284080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284080. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?撒哈拉以南非洲地区能够实现粮食自给自足吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):14964-14969. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610359113. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Climate-smart soils.气候智能型土壤。
Nature. 2016 Apr 7;532(7597):49-57. doi: 10.1038/nature17174.
7
The contentious nature of soil organic matter.土壤有机质的争议性。
Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):60-8. doi: 10.1038/nature16069. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验