Jost Meike, Brüstle Peter, Giesler Marianne, Rijntjes Michel, Brich Jochen
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Center of Competence for the Evaluation of Teaching in Medicine Baden-Württemberg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 14;10(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2614-9.
In the field of Neurology good clinical reasoning skills are essential for successful diagnosing and treatment. Team-based learning (TBL), an active learning and small group instructional strategy, is a promising method for fostering these skills. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the effects of a supplementary TBL-class on students' clinical decision-making skills.
Fourth- and fifth-year medical students participated in this pilot study (static-group comparison design). The non-treatment group (n = 15) did not receive any additional training beyond regular teaching in the neurology course. The treatment group (n = 11) took part in a supplementary TBL-class optimized for teaching clinical reasoning in addition to the regular teaching in the neurology course. Clinical decision making skills were assessed using a key-feature problem examination. Factual and conceptual knowledge was assessed by a multiple-choice question examination.
The TBL-group performed significantly better than the non-TBL-group (p = 0.026) in the key-feature problem examination. No significant differences between the results of the multiple-choice question examination of both groups were found.
In this pilot study participants of a supplementary TBL-class significantly improved clinical decision-making skills, indicating that TBL may be an appropriate method for teaching clinical decision making in neurology. Further research is needed for replication in larger groups and other clinical fields.
在神经病学领域,良好的临床推理能力对于成功诊断和治疗至关重要。基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种主动学习和小组教学策略,是培养这些技能的一种有前景的方法。本试点研究的目的是检验补充性TBL课程对学生临床决策技能的影响。
四、五年级医学生参与了本试点研究(静态组比较设计)。非治疗组(n = 15)除了神经病学课程的常规教学外未接受任何额外培训。治疗组(n = 11)除了神经病学课程的常规教学外,还参加了为教授临床推理而优化的补充性TBL课程。使用关键特征问题考试评估临床决策技能。通过多项选择题考试评估事实性和概念性知识。
在关键特征问题考试中,TBL组的表现明显优于非TBL组(p = 0.026)。两组多项选择题考试结果未发现显著差异。
在本试点研究中,补充性TBL课程的参与者显著提高了临床决策技能,表明TBL可能是神经病学临床决策教学的一种合适方法。需要进一步研究以在更大群体和其他临床领域进行重复验证。