• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is Cancer Information Exchanged on Social Media Scientifically Accurate?社交媒体上交流的癌症信息在科学上准确吗?
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Dec;33(6):1328-1332. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1254-z.
2
Cancer Communication on Social Media: Examining How Cancer Caregivers Use Facebook for Cancer-Related Communication.社交媒体上的癌症交流:探究癌症护理者如何利用脸书进行与癌症相关的交流。
Cancer Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;40(4):332-338. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000418.
3
Deciphering the Signal From the Noise: Caregivers' Information Appraisal and Credibility Assessment of Cancer-Related Information Exchanged on Social Networking Sites.从噪音中解读信号:护理人员对社交网站上交流的癌症相关信息的信息评估与可信度评估
Cancer Control. 2019 Jan-Dec;26(1):1073274819841609. doi: 10.1177/1073274819841609.
4
Communication and Exchange of Specialized Health-Related Support Among People With Experiential Similarity on Facebook.Facebook 上具有相似经验的人之间的专业健康支持的交流与交换。
Health Commun. 2017 Oct;32(10):1233-1240. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1196518. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
5
Exploring Hospitals' Use of Facebook: Thematic Analysis.探索医院对脸书的使用:主题分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 16;20(5):e190. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9549.
6
A Picture Really is Worth a Thousand Words: Public Engagement with the National Cancer Institute on Social Media.一张图片真的抵得上千言万语:美国国立癌症研究所与社交媒体上公众的互动
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Mar;32(1):155-157. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0901-5.
7
Knowledge Exchange and Discovery in the Age of Social Media: The Journey From Inception to Establishment of a Parent-Led Web-Based Research Advisory Community for Childhood Disability.社交媒体时代的知识交流与发现:从创立到建立一个由家长主导的基于网络的儿童残疾研究咨询社区的历程。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 11;18(11):e293. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5994.
8
Examination of bariatric surgery Facebook support groups: a content analysis.肥胖症手术 Facebook 支持小组的调查:一项内容分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Aug;13(8):1369-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
9
Health Information in the Era of Social Media: An Analysis of the Nature and Accuracy of Posts Made by Public Facebook Pages for Patients with Endometriosis.社交媒体时代的健康信息:对子宫内膜异位症患者公共 Facebook 页面发布内容的性质和准确性的分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1637-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
10
Content and accuracy of nutrition-related posts in bariatric surgery Facebook support groups.减重手术 Facebook 支持群组中与营养相关的帖子的内容和准确性。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Dec;14(12):1897-1902. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Trust in Different Sources of Information: Gaps in Rural Residents and Cancer Patients.公众对不同信息来源的信任:农村居民与癌症患者的差距
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 15;13(6):640. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060640.
2
"Crying in the Wilderness"-The Use of Web-Based Support in Telomere Biology Disorders: Thematic Analysis.《荒野中的哭泣》——基于网络的支持在端粒生物学紊乱中的应用:主题分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 16;8:e64343. doi: 10.2196/64343.
3
Alternative Health and Conventional Medicine Discourse About Cancer on TikTok: Computer Vision Analysis of TikTok Videos.TikTok上替代医学与传统医学关于癌症的论述:TikTok视频的计算机视觉分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 9;26:e60283. doi: 10.2196/60283.
4
Cancer-related Keywords in 2023: Insights from Text Mining of a Major Consumer Portal.2023年癌症相关关键词:来自某大型消费门户网站文本挖掘的见解
Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Oct;30(4):398-408. doi: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.4.398. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
5
Investigation and analysis of the status of cancer health popularization in China, 2023.2023年中国癌症健康普及状况调查与分析
World J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 24;15(10):1269-1279. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i10.1269.
6
A Health Media Literacy Intervention Increases Skepticism of Both Inaccurate and Accurate Cancer News Among U.S. Adults.一项健康媒体素养干预措施提高了美国成年人对不准确和准确的癌症新闻的怀疑态度。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Nov 16;58(12):820-831. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae054.
7
Social media "SoMe" in neuro-oncology: a review of the literature.神经肿瘤学中的社交媒体:文献综述
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jan;171(1):11-19. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04845-6. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
8
Communication in oncology between healthcare providers, patients, the scientific community, and the media: recommendations from the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).肿瘤学领域中医疗保健提供者、患者、科学界和媒体之间的沟通:意大利肿瘤医学协会(AIOM)的建议。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 26;32(9):613. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08786-8.
9
Exploring important service characteristics of telephone cancer information and support services for callers: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative research.探索电话癌症信息和支持服务对来电者的重要服务特征:一项系统评价定性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):e078399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078399.
10
Prioritising Informed Health Choices Key Concepts for those impacted by cancer: a protocol.优先考虑明智的健康选择:癌症患者关键概念:一项方案
HRB Open Res. 2022 Aug 4;5:55. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13593.1. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Angelina effect revisited: Exploring a media-related impact on public awareness.安吉丽娜效应再探:探究媒体对公众意识的影响。
Cancer. 2015 Nov 15;121(22):3959-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29461. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
2
Tweeting About Prostate and Testicular Cancers: What Are Individuals Saying in Their Discussions About the 2013 Movember Canada Campaign?在推特上谈论前列腺癌和睾丸癌:在关于2013年加拿大“胡子月”活动的讨论中,人们都说了些什么?
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Sep;31(3):559-66. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0838-8.
3
Communicating about cancer through Facebook: a qualitative analysis of a breast cancer awareness page.通过脸书交流癌症相关信息:对一个乳腺癌知识普及页面的定性分析
J Health Commun. 2015;20(2):237-43. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.927034. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
4
Obesity in social media: a mixed methods analysis.社交媒体中的肥胖问题:一项混合方法分析。
Transl Behav Med. 2014 Sep;4(3):314-23. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0256-1.
5
ePatients on YouTube: analysis of four experiences from the patients' perspective.YouTube 上的电子患者:从患者角度对四种经历的分析
Med 2 0. 2012 Apr 25;1(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/med2.2039. eCollection 2012 Jan-Jun.
6
Pediatric cancer and the internet: exploring the gap in doctor-parents communication.
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Mar;30(1):145-51. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0700-4.
7
Do cancer patients tweet? Examining the twitter use of cancer patients in Japan.癌症患者会发推文吗?调查日本癌症患者对推特的使用情况。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 27;16(5):e137. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3298.
8
Understanding topics and sentiment in an online cancer survivor community.了解在线癌症幸存者社区中的话题与情绪。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013 Dec;2013(47):195-8. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt025.
9
The road toward fully transparent medical records.通往完全透明医疗记录的道路。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370(1):6-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1310132. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
10
Practicing in partnership with Dr. Google: the growing effect of social media in oncology practice and research.与谷歌医生合作实践:社交媒体在肿瘤学实践和研究中的日益影响。
Oncologist. 2013;18(7):780-2. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0453. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

社交媒体上交流的癌症信息在科学上准确吗?

Is Cancer Information Exchanged on Social Media Scientifically Accurate?

作者信息

Gage-Bouchard Elizabeth A, LaValley Susan, Warunek Molli, Beaupin Lynda Kwon, Mollica Michelle

机构信息

Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, The University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2018 Dec;33(6):1328-1332. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1254-z.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-017-1254-z
PMID:28721645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5775059/
Abstract

Cancer patients and their caregivers are increasingly using social media as a platform to share cancer experiences, connect with support, and exchange cancer-related information. Yet, little is known about the nature and scientific accuracy of cancer-related information exchanged on social media. We conducted a content analysis of 12 months of data from 18 publically available Facebook Pages hosted by parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (N = 15,852 posts) and extracted all exchanges of medically-oriented cancer information. We systematically coded for themes in the nature of cancer-related information exchanged on personal Facebook Pages and two oncology experts independently evaluated the scientific accuracy of each post. Of the 15,852 total posts, 171 posts contained medically-oriented cancer information. The most frequent type of cancer information exchanged was information related to treatment protocols and health services use (35%) followed by information related to side effects and late effects (26%), medication (16%), medical caregiving strategies (13%), alternative and complementary therapies (8%), and other (2%). Overall, 67% of all cancer information exchanged was deemed medically/scientifically accurate, 19% was not medically/scientifically accurate, and 14% described unproven treatment modalities. These findings highlight the potential utility of social media as a cancer-related resource, but also indicate that providers should focus on recommending reliable, evidence-based sources to patients and caregivers.

摘要

癌症患者及其护理人员越来越多地将社交媒体作为分享癌症经历、寻求支持以及交流癌症相关信息的平台。然而,对于在社交媒体上交流的癌症相关信息的性质和科学准确性,我们却知之甚少。我们对18个由急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿家长创建的公开Facebook页面上12个月的数据进行了内容分析(共15,852条帖子),并提取了所有以医学为导向的癌症信息交流内容。我们系统地对个人Facebook页面上交流的癌症相关信息的主题进行了编码,两位肿瘤学专家独立评估了每条帖子的科学准确性。在总共15,852条帖子中,有171条包含以医学为导向的癌症信息。交流最频繁的癌症信息类型是与治疗方案和医疗服务使用相关的信息(35%),其次是与副作用和远期效应相关的信息(26%)、药物(16%)、医疗护理策略(13%)、替代和补充疗法(8%)以及其他(2%)。总体而言,所有交流的癌症信息中有67%被认为在医学/科学上是准确的,19%在医学/科学上不准确,14%描述的是未经证实的治疗方式。这些发现凸显了社交媒体作为癌症相关资源的潜在效用,但也表明医疗服务提供者应专注于向患者和护理人员推荐可靠的、基于证据的信息来源。