• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提供酒驾风险信息的意外后果。

The unintended effects of providing risk information about drinking and driving.

作者信息

Johnson Mark B, Kopetz Catalina E

机构信息

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation.

Department of Psychology, Wayne State University.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;36(9):872-880. doi: 10.1037/hea0000526. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1037/hea0000526
PMID:28726469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5591027/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Alcohol-impaired driving remains a serious public health concern despite the fact that drinking and driving risks are widely disseminated and well understood by the public. This research examines the motivational conditions under which providing risk information can exacerbate rather than decrease potential drinking drivers' willingness to drive while impaired.

METHOD

In a hypothetical drinking and driving scenario, 3 studies investigated participants' self-reported likelihood of drinking and driving as a function of (a) accessibility of information regarding risk associated with drinking and driving, (b) motivation to drive, and (c) need for cognitive closure (NFC).

RESULTS

Across the 3 studies, participants self-reported a higher likelihood of driving when exposed to high-risk information (vs. low-risk information) if they were high in NFC. Risk information did decrease self-reported likelihood of driving among low-NFC participants (Studies 1-3). Furthermore, this effect was exacerbated when the relevant motivation (to get home conveniently) was high (Study 3).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings have important implications for impaired-driving prevention efforts. They suggest that at least under some circumstances, risk information can have unintended negative effects on drinking and driving decisions. The results are consistent with the motivated cognition literature, which suggests that people process and use information in a manner that supports their most accessible and important motivation despite potentially negative consequences. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目的

尽管酒后驾车的风险已得到广泛传播且公众也普遍了解,但酒后驾车仍是一个严重的公共卫生问题。本研究考察了在何种动机条件下,提供风险信息会加剧而非降低潜在酒后驾驶者在受损状态下驾车的意愿。

方法

在一个假设的酒后驾车场景中,3项研究调查了参与者自我报告的酒后驾车可能性,该可能性是以下因素的函数:(a)与酒后驾车相关风险信息的可获取性,(b)驾车动机,以及(c)认知闭合需求(NFC)。

结果

在这3项研究中,NFC得分高的参与者在接触高风险信息(与低风险信息相比)时,自我报告的驾车可能性更高。风险信息确实降低了NFC得分低的参与者自我报告的驾车可能性(研究1 - 3)。此外,当相关动机(为了方便回家)较高时,这种影响会加剧(研究3)。

结论

这些发现对预防酒后驾车的努力具有重要意义。它们表明,至少在某些情况下,风险信息可能会对酒后驾车决策产生意想不到的负面影响。这些结果与动机性认知文献一致,该文献表明,人们会以一种支持其最易获取且最重要动机的方式处理和使用信息,尽管可能会有负面后果。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
The unintended effects of providing risk information about drinking and driving.提供酒驾风险信息的意外后果。
Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;36(9):872-880. doi: 10.1037/hea0000526. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
2
Identifying the Population Sources of Alcohol Impaired Driving: An Assessment of Context Specific Drinking Risks.识别酒驾人群来源:特定环境下饮酒风险评估。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Sep;79(5):702-709. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.702.
3
The potential effects of autonomous vehicles on alcohol consumption and drink-driving behaviours.自动驾驶汽车对酒精消费和酒后驾驶行为的潜在影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Jul;39(5):604-607. doi: 10.1111/dar.13055. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
4
Perceived danger while intoxicated uniquely contributes to driving after drinking.醉酒时感知到的危险是酒后驾车的独特成因。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Feb;38(2):521-8. doi: 10.1111/acer.12252. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
5
Drivers who self-estimate lower blood alcohol concentrations are riskier drivers after drinking.自我估计血液酒精浓度较低的司机在饮酒后驾车风险更高。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Apr;233(8):1387-94. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4233-x. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
6
Differences in alcohol cognitions, consumption, and consequences among first-time DUI offenders who co-use alcohol and marijuana.首次酒后驾车且同时使用酒精和大麻的违法者在酒精认知、饮酒量和后果方面的差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Oct 1;191:187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
7
Acceptance of drinking and driving and alcohol-involved driving crashes in California.加利福尼亚州对酒后驾车及与酒精相关的交通事故的接受程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Aug;81:134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.035. Epub 2015 May 14.
8
Acute effects of alcohol on inhibitory control and simulated driving in DUI offenders.酒精对酒驾者抑制控制和模拟驾驶的急性影响。
J Safety Res. 2014 Jun;49:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
9
Event-Level Predictors of Alcohol-Impaired Driving Intentions.事件层面预测酒精影响下的驾驶意图。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Sep;81(5):647-654. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.647.
10
Modeling the influence of 0.03%, 0.05% and 0.08% blood alcohol concentrations on lane positioning and steering control of Indian drivers.模拟 0.03%、0.05%和 0.08%血液酒精浓度对印度驾驶员车道定位和转向控制的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(5):343-348. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1921169. Epub 2021 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision Making and Alcohol: Health Policy Implications.决策与酒精:对健康政策的影响
Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Mar 1;6(1):64-71. doi: 10.1177/2372732218818587. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of responsible drinking messages on attentional allocation and drinking behaviour.适度饮酒信息对注意力分配和饮酒行为的影响。
Addict Behav. 2015 May;44:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.035. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
2
Contribution of excessive alcohol consumption to deaths and years of potential life lost in the United States.过度饮酒对美国死亡人数及潜在寿命损失年数的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 26;11:E109. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130293.
3
Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking.以个体为中心的大学生饮酒预防方法。
Alcohol Res Health. 2011;34(2):210-21.
4
Using the Drinking Expectancy Questionnaire (revised scoring method) in clinical practice.在临床实践中使用《饮酒期待问卷》(修订评分法)。
Addict Behav. 2012 Feb;37(2):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
5
Validation of the Cannabis Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) in adult cannabis users in treatment.验证成人大麻使用者在治疗中的大麻预期问卷(CEQ)。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Jun 1;115(3):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.10.025. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
6
Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior.内隐认知与成瘾:解释矛盾行为的工具。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:551-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444.
7
See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception.看到你想看的:动机对视觉感知的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Oct;91(4):612-25. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612.
8
Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation.喜好关乎行为:目标追求对自动评价的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):557-72. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557.
9
The quest for the gist: on challenges of going abstract in social and personality psychology.对要点的探寻:论社会与人格心理学中走向抽象化的挑战。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(2):156-63. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_9.
10
When opportunity knocks: bottom-up priming of goals by means and its effects on self-regulation.当机遇来敲门:目标的自下而上手段启动及其对自我调节的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;84(6):1109-22. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1109.