Wang Yanpei, Xu Qinfang, Liao Shuirong, Jia Demei
aState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning bSchool of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing cSchool of Languages, Nanjing Normal University of Special Education, Nanjing dDepartment of Psychology, College of Educational Science, XinJiang Normal University, Urumqi, China.
Neuroreport. 2017 Sep 27;28(14):872-878. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000847.
Although the spacing effect is one of most robust effects in learning, its cognitive and neural mechanisms are still under investigation. Whether the spacing effect is achieved by reducing neural repetition priming or depends on learning experience is still unclear. In this event-related potential study, participants were asked to memorize 140 novel faces, half under the massed learning condition and the other half under the spaced learning condition. The afterwards recognition tests indicated that participants recognized more items under the spaced learning condition than under the massed learning condition. The electroencephalography data suggested that spaced learning was associated with a reduced familiarity effect in frontal N400. Remembered faces showed smaller repetition priming than forgotten faces under both learning conditions and spaced learning significantly reduced repetition suppression. Although no direct association was found between repetition priming and episodic memory, the difference in quantity between spaced learning and massed learning in the repetition priming can predict the different quantities in the recognition memory. These results suggest that the neural mechanism of the spacing effect is influenced by experience; however, the impact is mainly repetition priming and the spacing effect is still very robust.
尽管间隔效应是学习中最显著的效应之一,但其认知和神经机制仍在研究中。间隔效应是通过减少神经重复启动实现的,还是取决于学习经验,目前尚不清楚。在这项事件相关电位研究中,参与者被要求记忆140张新面孔,一半在集中学习条件下,另一半在间隔学习条件下。随后的识别测试表明,参与者在间隔学习条件下比在集中学习条件下识别出更多项目。脑电图数据表明,间隔学习与额叶N400中熟悉度效应的降低有关。在两种学习条件下,被记住的面孔比被遗忘的面孔表现出更小的重复启动,并且间隔学习显著降低了重复抑制。虽然在重复启动和情景记忆之间未发现直接关联,但间隔学习和集中学习在重复启动方面的数量差异可以预测识别记忆中的不同数量。这些结果表明,间隔效应的神经机制受经验影响;然而,这种影响主要是重复启动,并且间隔效应仍然非常显著。