Tabung Fred K, Huang Tianyi, Giovannucci Edward L, Smith-Warner Stephanie A, Tworoger Shelley S, Poole Elizabeth M
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Br J Cancer. 2017 Sep 5;117(6):907-911. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.246. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
We used a food-based empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) score to investigate whether diets with higher inflammatory potential are associated with increased ovarian cancer risk.
We followed 186 314 women in the Nurses' Health Study and Nurses' Health Study-II, from 1984 to 2013, to examine associations between EDIP scores and ovarian cancer risk, using Cox regression analyses.
During 3 454 514 person-years of follow-up, 989 ovarian cancer cases were identified. In pooled multivariable-adjusted analyses, higher EDIP scores (more pro-inflammatory diets) were not significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk (HR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.80-1.22; P-trend=0.97). Similarly, we found no evidence of heterogeneity by histologic subtype (P-heterogeneity=0.52) or by tumour aggressiveness (P-heterogeneity=0.63).
In contrast with two previous case-control studies that found a positive association between a literature-derived nutrient-based dietary inflammatory index and ovarian cancer risk, our prospective analyses using a food-based score observed no evidence of an association.
我们使用基于食物的经验性饮食炎症模式(EDIP)评分来研究具有较高炎症潜力的饮食是否与卵巢癌风险增加相关。
在1984年至2013年期间,我们对护士健康研究和护士健康研究II中的186314名女性进行了随访,采用Cox回归分析来检验EDIP评分与卵巢癌风险之间的关联。
在3454514人年的随访期间,共确诊989例卵巢癌病例。在汇总的多变量调整分析中,较高的EDIP评分(更具促炎作用的饮食)与卵巢癌风险无显著关联(风险比0.99;95%置信区间:0.80-1.22;P趋势=0.97)。同样,我们未发现按组织学亚型(P异质性=0.52)或肿瘤侵袭性(P异质性=0.63)存在异质性的证据。
与之前两项病例对照研究结果相反,那两项研究发现基于文献的营养素饮食炎症指数与卵巢癌风险呈正相关,而我们使用基于食物的评分进行的前瞻性分析未发现存在关联的证据。