Alerhand Stephen, Wood Sumintra, Long Brit, Koyfman Alex
Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3841 Roger Brooke Dr, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;12(8):1179-1183. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1718-5. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but devastating condition. Entry of infectious contents into the epidural space occurs via contiguous infected tissue, hematogenous spread, or iatrogenic inoculation. Traditionally, emergency providers are taught to assess for the "classic triad" of spinal pain, fever, and neurological deficits, but this constellation of findings is seen in only 10-15% of cases. Delays in diagnosis and treatment of this condition directly correspond to worse, and often debilitating, outcomes for these patients. This review will demonstrate the challenges of diagnosing SEA, describe key diagnostic pitfalls, and present a model and framework for its evaluation. The authors conducted a systematic review in PubMed and Google Scholar for articles describing the emergency medicine evaluation and management of spinal epidural abscess dating from 1996 to 2016. Of the initial 219 articles found, 18 articles were selected based on their relevancy to emergency medicine. Lower back pain is a common chief complaint, whereas SEA is a rare condition and may not be anticipated. The "classic triad" of SEA symptoms presents infrequently. Moreover, the early symptoms of back pain and fever are non-specific, and patients seek medical attention at varying stages of disease progression. Once the more conspicuous and wide-ranging neurological symptoms develop, they are often irreversible. In fact, final outcomes correlate with the severity and duration of symptoms before surgery. Furthermore, discovering these late neurological symptoms can be particularly difficult in bed-bound and chronically ill patients. MRI is the best diagnostic imaging tool for SEA. Early diagnosis is the major prognostic factor for favorable outcome of SEA, and yet, making this diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) has proved challenging. Shifting from a "classic triad" screening to a risk factor-based model of evaluation represents the current optimal strategy for diagnosing SEA. An algorithm incorporating the most recent data is provided.
脊柱硬膜外脓肿(SEA)是一种罕见但极具破坏性的疾病。感染性物质通过相邻感染组织、血行播散或医源性接种进入硬膜外间隙。传统上,急救人员被教导要评估脊柱疼痛、发热和神经功能缺损的“经典三联征”,但只有10% - 15%的病例会出现这一系列症状。这种疾病诊断和治疗的延迟直接对应着患者更差的、往往是致残的预后。本综述将阐述诊断SEA的挑战,描述关键的诊断陷阱,并提出其评估的模型和框架。作者在PubMed和谷歌学术上对1996年至2016年期间描述脊柱硬膜外脓肿的急诊医学评估和管理的文章进行了系统综述。在最初找到的219篇文章中,根据其与急诊医学的相关性选择了18篇文章。下背痛是常见的主要症状,而SEA是一种罕见疾病,可能无法预料。SEA症状的“经典三联征”很少出现。此外,背痛和发热的早期症状不具有特异性,患者在疾病进展的不同阶段寻求医疗帮助。一旦出现更明显、范围更广的神经症状,往往就不可逆转了。事实上,最终预后与手术前症状的严重程度和持续时间相关。此外,在卧床和慢性病患者中发现这些晚期神经症状可能特别困难。MRI是诊断SEA的最佳影像学工具。早期诊断是SEA良好预后的主要预测因素,然而,在急诊科(ED)做出这种诊断已被证明具有挑战性。从“经典三联征”筛查转向基于风险因素的评估模型是目前诊断SEA的最佳策略。提供了一种纳入最新数据的算法。