• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项旨在确定急诊科轻度创伤性脑损伤诊断准确性的监测研究:一项回顾性队列研究方案。

A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Medical Research Institute, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e016222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016222.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016222
PMID:28780552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5629740/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous literature confirms that a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may result in long-term emotional impacts and, in vulnerable subgroups, cognitive deficits. The accurate diagnosis of mTBI and its written documentation is an important first step towards providing appropriate and timely clinical care. Surveillance studies involving emergency department (ED) and hospital-based data need to be prioritised as these provide incident mTBI estimates. This project will advance existing research findings by estimating the occurrence of mTBI among those attending an ED and quantifying the accuracy of mTBI diagnoses recorded by ED staff through a comprehensive audit of ED records.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Retrospective chart reviews (between June 2015 and June 2016) of electronic clinical records from an ED in Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) will be conducted. The study population will include persons aged 18-65 years who attended the ED with any clinical features potentially indicative of mTBI. The WHO operational criteria for the clinical identification of mTBI cases is the presence of: (1) a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13-15 after 30 min postinjury or on presentation to hospital; (2) one or more of the following: post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) of less than 24 hours' duration, confusion or disorientation, a witnessed loss of consciousness for ≤30 min and/or a positive CT brain scan. We estimate that 30 000 ED attendances will be screened and that a sample size of 500 cases with mTBI will be identified during this 1-year period, which will provide reliable estimates of mTBI occurrence in the ED setting.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Ethics Committee. The committee deemed this study as low risk in terms of ethical issues. The written papers from this study will be submitted for publication in quality peer-reviewed medical and health journals. Study findings will be disseminated via presentations at national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

摘要

简介

既往文献证实,轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)可能导致长期的情绪影响,在易受影响的亚组中,还可能导致认知缺陷。mTBI 的准确诊断及其书面记录是提供适当和及时临床护理的重要第一步。需要优先进行涉及急诊科(ED)和医院数据的监测研究,因为这些研究提供了 mTBI 的发生率估计。该项目将通过对 ED 记录进行全面审核,来估算 ED 就诊者中 mTBI 的发生率,并量化 ED 工作人员记录的 mTBI 诊断的准确性,从而推进现有研究结果。

方法和分析

对澳大利亚新南威尔士州悉尼市 ED 的电子临床记录进行回顾性图表审查(2015 年 6 月至 2016 年 6 月)。研究人群将包括年龄在 18-65 岁之间,因任何可能提示 mTBI 的临床特征而就诊 ED 的患者。WHO 用于临床识别 mTBI 病例的操作性标准为:(1)伤后 30 分钟或入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为 13-15;(2)以下一种或多种情况:创伤后遗忘症(PTA)持续时间少于 24 小时、意识模糊或定向障碍、目击者意识丧失时间≤30 分钟和/或 CT 脑扫描阳性。我们估计将对 30000 次 ED 就诊进行筛查,在这 1 年期间将确定 500 例 mTBI 病例的样本量,这将为 ED 环境中 mTBI 的发生率提供可靠估计。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得北悉尼地方卫生区伦理委员会的批准。委员会认为,从伦理角度来看,这项研究风险较低。本研究的书面论文将提交给高质量的同行评议医学和健康期刊发表。研究结果将通过在全国/国际会议和同行评议期刊上的演讲进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1956/5629740/8d86e22ce46d/bmjopen-2017-016222f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1956/5629740/8d86e22ce46d/bmjopen-2017-016222f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1956/5629740/8d86e22ce46d/bmjopen-2017-016222f01.jpg

相似文献

1
A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.一项旨在确定急诊科轻度创伤性脑损伤诊断准确性的监测研究:一项回顾性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e016222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016222.
2
Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study.急性轻度创伤性脑损伤的识别挑战:来自急诊科监测研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 3;10(2):e034494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034494.
3
Missed Emergency Department Diagnosis of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients with Chronic Pain After Motor Vehicle Collision.机动车事故后慢性疼痛患者的急诊轻度创伤性脑损伤漏诊。
Pain Physician. 2023 Jan;26(1):101-110.
4
Advancing Concussion Assessment in Pediatrics (A-CAP): a prospective, concurrent cohort, longitudinal study of mild traumatic brain injury in children: protocol study.儿科脑震荡评估进展(A-CAP):一项关于儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤的前瞻性、同期队列纵向研究:方案研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e017012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017012.
5
Stockholm score of lesion detection on computed tomography following mild traumatic brain injury (SELECT-TBI): study protocol for a multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study.轻度创伤性脑损伤(SELECT-TBI)后计算机断层扫描的病变检测斯德哥尔摩评分:一项多中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e060679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060679.
6
Acute post-concussive symptoms in young children.幼儿的急性脑震荡后症状
Brain Inj. 2017;31(11):1414-1421. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1350999. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
Understanding Why Patients Return to the Emergency Department after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury within 72 Hours.了解轻度创伤性脑损伤患者在72小时内重返急诊科的原因。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 May;16(3):481-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.2.23546. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
8
Early identification and incidence of mild TBI in Ontario.安大略省轻度创伤性脑损伤的早期识别与发病率
Can J Neurol Sci. 2009 Jul;36(4):429-35. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100007745.
9
Exploring Serum Biomarkers for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury探索轻度创伤性脑损伤的血清生物标志物
10
The diagnostic accuracy of the Revised Westmead PTA Scale as an adjunct to the Glasgow Coma Scale in the early identification of cognitive impairment in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.修订版韦斯特米德PTA量表作为格拉斯哥昏迷量表的辅助工具,用于早期识别轻度创伤性脑损伤患者认知障碍的诊断准确性。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;79(10):1100-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.132571. Epub 2008 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a guideline implementation tool for supporting management of mental health complications after mild traumatic brain injury in primary care: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.轻度创伤性脑损伤后支持初级保健中精神健康并发症管理的指南实施工具的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 21;12(6):e062527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062527.
2
Validation of ICD-10-CM surveillance codes for traumatic brain injury inpatient hospitalizations.用于创伤性脑损伤住院患者的国际疾病分类第十版临床修正版(ICD - 10 - CM)监测编码的验证
Brain Inj. 2020 Dec 5;34(13-14):1763-1770. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1849801. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological impact of injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes: systematic review and meta-analysis.机动车事故致伤的心理影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e011993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011993.
2
Neurosensory Symptom Complexes after Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.急性轻度创伤性脑损伤后的神经感觉症状复合体
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 4;11(1):e0146039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146039. eCollection 2016.
3
Identifying posttraumatic amnesia in individuals with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 15 after mild traumatic brain injury.
Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study.
急性轻度创伤性脑损伤的识别挑战:来自急诊科监测研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 3;10(2):e034494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034494.
4
Association between head injury and concussion with retinal vessel caliber.头部损伤和脑震荡与视网膜血管口径的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0200441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200441. eCollection 2018.
在轻度创伤性脑损伤后格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为15分的个体中识别创伤后遗忘症。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):956-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Mild traumatic brain injury and motor vehicle crashes: limitations to our understanding.轻度创伤性脑损伤与机动车碰撞事故:我们认知的局限性
Injury. 2015 Oct;46(10):1871-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.044. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
5
Systematic review of multivariable prognostic models for mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤多变量预后模型的系统评价
J Neurotrauma. 2015 Apr 15;32(8):517-26. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3600. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
6
Population-based, inception cohort study of the incidence, course, and prognosis of mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collisions.基于人群的机动车事故后轻度创伤性脑损伤发生率、病程和预后的发病队列研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S278-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.295.
7
The neuropsychological outcomes of concussion: a systematic review of meta-analyses on the cognitive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury.脑震荡的神经心理学结局:对轻度创伤性脑损伤认知后果的荟萃分析的系统评价。
Neuropsychology. 2014 May;28(3):321-36. doi: 10.1037/neu0000037. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
8
Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: a population-based study.新西兰创伤性脑损伤的发生率:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jan;12(1):53-64. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70262-4. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
9
Validation of the Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale: a brief measure to identify acute cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury.简化版韦斯特米德创伤后遗忘量表的验证:一种用于识别轻度创伤性脑损伤中急性认知障碍的简短测量方法。
Brain Inj. 2011;25(12):1198-205. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.608213. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
10
Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: a National Academy of Neuropsychology education paper.轻度创伤性脑损伤的诊断建议:美国国家神经心理学学会教育论文
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Feb;24(1):3-10. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp006. Epub 2009 Mar 17.