Nangendo Joanita, Obuku Ekwaro A, Kawooya Ismael, Mukisa John, Nalutaaya Annet, Musewa Angella, Semitala Fred C, Karamagi Charles A, Kalyango Joan N
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Africa Centre for Systematic Reviews and Knowledge Translation, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0182050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182050. eCollection 2017.
The prevalence of HIV in Uganda is 7.3%, and yet nearly 40% of people living with HIV are unaware of their status. The current HIV testing policy which is strictly blood-based poses several challenges including: a need for high level laboratory skills, stringent waste disposal needs, and painful sample collection. It is envisaged that introduction of a rapid, painless HIV oral fluid test as a potential alternative is likely to increase the number of people testing. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of rapid HIV oral testing among adults attending Kisenyi Health Centre IV in Kampala.
We conducted a cross-sectional study among 440 adults recruited consecutively at Kisenyi Health Centre IV from January to March 2016. The diagnostic accuracy of the HIV oral test was assessed by comparing to the national HIV serial testing algorithm. We also assessed for acceptability among patients and health care workers (HCWs) by triangulating responses from a structured questionnaire, three focus group discussions and seven key informant interviews. Acceptability was defined as willingness to take the test at the time of the study and intention for future use of the test if it was availed. The prevalence of HIV infection among study participants was 14.8%. The HIV oral fluid test was highly accurate with sensitivity of 100% (95% CI; 94.5-100.0), specificity of 100% (95% CI; 99.0-100.0), positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% (95% CI; 94.5-100.0) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (95% CI; 99.0-100.0). Acceptability of HIV oral testing was also high at 87.0% (95% CI; 83.6-89.9). Participants preferred HIV oral testing because it was: pain free (91%, n = 399) and did not require blood draw (82%, n = 360).
The HIV oral fluid test has high diagnostic accuracy and acceptability. HIV oral testing is a suitable addition to the national HIV testing strategies with the potential of increasing access to HIV testing services in Uganda.
乌干达的艾滋病毒感染率为7.3%,然而近40%的艾滋病毒感染者并不知道自己的感染状况。当前严格基于血液检测的艾滋病毒检测政策带来了诸多挑战,包括:需要高水平的实验室技能、严格的废物处理要求以及痛苦的样本采集过程。预计引入一种快速、无痛的艾滋病毒口腔液检测作为一种潜在替代方法可能会增加检测人数。本研究的目的是确定在坎帕拉基森伊第四健康中心就诊的成年人中,快速艾滋病毒口腔检测的诊断准确性和可接受性。
我们于2016年1月至3月在基森伊第四健康中心对连续招募的440名成年人进行了一项横断面研究。通过与国家艾滋病毒系列检测算法进行比较,评估艾滋病毒口腔检测的诊断准确性。我们还通过对一份结构化问卷的回答、三次焦点小组讨论和七次关键 informant 访谈的结果进行三角分析,评估患者和医护人员(HCWs)的可接受性。可接受性被定义为在研究时愿意接受检测以及如果有该检测方法,未来使用它的意愿。研究参与者中艾滋病毒感染率为14.8%。艾滋病毒口腔液检测具有高度准确性,灵敏度为100%(95%CI;94.5 - 100.0),特异性为100%(95%CI;99.0 - 100.0),阳性预测值(PPV)为100%(95%CI;94.5 - 100.0),阴性预测值(NPV)为100%(95%CI;99.0 - 100.0)。艾滋病毒口腔检测的可接受性也很高,为87.0%(95%CI;83.6 - 89.9)。参与者更喜欢艾滋病毒口腔检测,因为它:无痛(91%,n = 399)且无需抽血(82%,n = 360)。
艾滋病毒口腔液检测具有高诊断准确性和可接受性。艾滋病毒口腔检测是国家艾滋病毒检测策略的合适补充,有可能增加乌干达获得艾滋病毒检测服务的机会。