Alison Jennifer A, Zafiropoulos Bill, Heard Robert
Faculty of Health Sciences Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney.
Allied Health Professorial Unit, Sydney Local Health District.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017 Aug 9;10:277-291. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S142009. eCollection 2017.
The aim of this study was to identify key factors affecting research capacity and engagement of allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health service. Identifying such factors will assist in determining strategies for building research capacity in allied health.
A total of 276 allied health professionals working within the Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) completed the Research Capacity in Context Tool (RCCT) that measures research capacity and culture across three domains: organization, team, and individual. An exploratory factor analysis was undertaken to identify common themes within each of these domains. Correlations were performed between demographic variables and the identified factors to determine possible relationships.
Research capacity and culture success/skill levels were reported to be higher within the organization and team domains compared to the individual domain (median [interquartile range, IQR] 6 [5-8], 6 [5-8], 5 [3-7], respectively; Friedman χ(2)=42.04, <0.001). Exploratory factor analyses were performed to identify factors that were perceived by allied health respondents to affect research capacity. Factors identified within the organization domain were infrastructure for research (eg, funds and equipment) and research culture (eg, senior manager's support for research); within the team domain the factors were research orientation (eg, dissemination of results at research seminars) and research support (eg, providing staff research training). Within the individual domain, only one factor was identified which was the research skill of the individual (eg, literature evaluation, submitting ethics applications and data analysis, and writing for publication).
The reported skill/success levels in research were lower for the individual domain compared to the organization or team domains. Key factors were identified in each domain that impacted on allied health research capacity. As these factors were different in each domain, various strategies may be required at the level of the organization, team, and individual to support and build allied health research capacity.
本研究旨在确定影响在大型都市卫生服务机构工作的专职医疗专业人员研究能力和参与度的关键因素。确定这些因素将有助于制定提升专职医疗领域研究能力的策略。
悉尼地方卫生区(SLHD)的276名专职医疗专业人员完成了“情境研究能力工具”(RCCT),该工具从组织、团队和个人三个领域衡量研究能力和文化。进行探索性因素分析以确定每个领域内的共同主题。对人口统计学变量与所确定的因素进行相关性分析,以确定可能的关系。
据报告,与个人领域相比,组织和团队领域的研究能力和文化成功/技能水平更高(中位数[四分位间距,IQR]分别为6[5 - 8]、6[5 - 8]、5[3 - 7];Friedman χ(2)=42.04,<0.001)。进行探索性因素分析以确定专职医疗受访者认为影响研究能力的因素。在组织领域确定的因素是研究基础设施(如资金和设备)和研究文化(如高级管理人员对研究的支持);在团队领域,因素是研究导向(如在研究研讨会上传播结果)和研究支持(如为员工提供研究培训)。在个人领域,仅确定了一个因素,即个人的研究技能(如文献评估、提交伦理申请和数据分析以及撰写发表文章)。
与组织或团队领域相比,个人领域报告的研究技能/成功水平较低。确定了每个领域中影响专职医疗研究能力的关键因素。由于每个领域的这些因素不同,可能需要在组织、团队和个人层面采取各种策略来支持和提升专职医疗研究能力。