Suppr超能文献

区分抑郁性假性痴呆与阿尔茨海默病:海马体积测量与认知测试的比较研究

Distinguishing Depressive Pseudodementia from Alzheimer Disease: A Comparative Study of Hippocampal Volumetry and Cognitive Tests.

作者信息

Sahin Sevki, Okluoglu Önal Tugba, Cinar Nilgun, Bozdemir Meral, Çubuk Rahmi, Karsidag Sibel

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2017 Jul 4;7(2):230-239. doi: 10.1159/000477759. eCollection 2017 May-Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Depressive pseudodementia (DPD) is a condition which may develop secondary to depression. The aim of this study was to contribute to the differential diagnosis between Alzheimer disease (AD) and DPD by comparing the neurocognitive tests and hippocampal volume.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who met criteria of AD/DPD were enrolled in the study. All patients were assessed using the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS), clock-drawing test, Stroop test, Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT), Boston Naming Test, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Hippocampal volume was measured by importing the coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance images to the Vitrea 2 workstation.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between the AD and DPD groups on the WMS test, clock-drawing test, Stroop test, Boston Naming Test, MMSE, GDS, and left hippocampal volume. A significant correlation between BFRT and bilateral hippocampal volumes was found in the AD group. No correlation was found among parameters in DPD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that evaluation of facial recognition and left hippocampal volume may provide more reliable evidence for distinguishing DPD from AD. Further investigations combined with functional imaging techniques including more patients are needed.

摘要

背景与目的

抑郁性假性痴呆(DPD)是一种可能继发于抑郁症的病症。本研究的目的是通过比较神经认知测试和海马体体积,为阿尔茨海默病(AD)与DPD的鉴别诊断提供依据。

材料与方法

符合AD/DPD标准的患者纳入本研究。所有患者均使用韦氏记忆量表(WMS)、画钟试验、斯特鲁普测验、本顿面部识别测验(BFRT)、波士顿命名测验、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和老年抑郁量表(GDS)进行评估。通过将冠状位T1加权磁共振图像导入Vitrea 2工作站来测量海马体体积。

结果

AD组和DPD组在WMS测试、画钟试验、斯特鲁普测验、波士顿命名测验、MMSE、GDS以及左侧海马体体积方面存在显著差异。在AD组中,BFRT与双侧海马体体积之间存在显著相关性。在DPD患者中,各参数之间未发现相关性。

结论

我们的结果表明,对面部识别和左侧海马体体积的评估可能为区分DPD和AD提供更可靠的证据。需要结合功能成像技术并纳入更多患者进行进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验