• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Creating Conditions for Patients' Values to Emerge in Clinical Conversations: Perspectives of Health Care Team Members.为患者价值观在临床对话中得以呈现创造条件:医疗团队成员的观点
DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf). 2017 Jun;2017:1165-1174. doi: 10.1145/3064663.3064669.
2
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
7
Patient perspectives on primary care and oncology care coordination in the context of multiple chronic conditions: A systematic review.患者对多种慢性病背景下初级保健和肿瘤学护理协调的看法:系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1003-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.11.014. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
Patient Insights Into the Design of Technology to Support a Strengths-Based Approach to Health Care.患者对支持基于优势的医疗保健方法的技术设计的见解。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Aug 24;5(3):e175. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5906.
9
10

引用本文的文献

1
What's In Your Kit? Mental Health Technology Kits for Depression Self-Management.你的工具包里有什么?用于抑郁症自我管理的心理健康技术工具包。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2025 Apr-May;2025. doi: 10.1145/3706598.3713585. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Designing Values Elicitation Technologies for Mental Health and Chronic Care Integration: User-Centered Design Approach.为精神卫生与慢性病护理整合设计价值观引出技术:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 19;9:e68419. doi: 10.2196/68419.
3
"Things That You Thought Mattered, None of That Matters": A Qualitative Exploration of Family Caregiver Values following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.“你曾认为重要的事,其实都无关紧要”:对左心室辅助装置植入术后家庭照顾者价值观的质性探索
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2025;40(4):334-344. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000001105. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
"When I do have some time, rather than spend it polishing silver, I want to spend it with my grandkids": a qualitative exploration of patient values following left ventricular assist device implantation.“当我有一些时间时,我宁愿和我的孙子孙女们一起度过,而不是花时间擦亮银器”:一项关于左心室辅助装置植入后患者价值观的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 May 22;23(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01454-y.
5
Primary Care Physician Perspectives on the Influence of Patient Values, Health Priorities, and Preferences on Clinical Decision-Making for Complex Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.基层医疗医生对患者价值观、健康优先事项和偏好对患有多种疾病的复杂患者临床决策影响的看法:一项定性研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 16;15:2135-2146. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S380021. eCollection 2022.
6
The Influence of Personal Health Data on the Health Coaching Process.个人健康数据对健康指导过程的影响。
Front Big Data. 2022 Jun 14;5:678061. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.678061. eCollection 2022.
7
Understanding Patient and Clinical Stakeholder Perspectives to Improve Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening.了解患者和临床利益相关者的观点,以提高肺癌筛查的依从性。
Perm J. 2021 Jun 2;25:20.295. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.295.
8
Toward the Value Sensitive Design of eHealth Technologies to Support Self-management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Content Analysis.迈向支持心血管疾病自我管理的电子健康技术的价值敏感设计:内容分析
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Dec 1;5(2):e31985. doi: 10.2196/31985.
9
Aligning care with the personal values of patients with complex care needs.使医疗照护符合具有复杂医疗需求患者的个人价值观。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1037-1044. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13862. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
The Perspectives of Professional Caregivers on Implementing Audio-Based Technology in Residential Dementia Care.专业照护者对在住宅痴呆症照护中实施基于音频的技术的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(17):6333. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176333.

本文引用的文献

1
"It just seems outside my health": How Patients with Chronic Conditions Perceive Communication Boundaries with Providers.“这似乎超出了我的健康范畴”:慢性病患者如何看待与医护人员之间的沟通界限。
DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf). 2016 Jun;2016:1172-1184. doi: 10.1145/2901790.2901866.
2
Patient-Clinician Communication: The Roadmap for HCI.患者与临床医生的沟通:人机交互的路线图。
Ext Abstr Hum Factors Computing Syst. 2013 Apr 27;2013:3291-3294. doi: 10.1145/2468356.2479669.
3
Primary care visit preparation and communication for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: A qualitative study of patients and physicians.糖尿病控制不佳患者的初级保健就诊准备与沟通:一项针对患者和医生的定性研究
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Apr;11(2):148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
User-Centered Design of a Tablet Waiting Room Tool for Complex Patients to Prioritize Discussion Topics for Primary Care Visits.以患者为中心设计平板电脑等候室工具,帮助复杂患者在初级保健就诊时确定讨论主题的优先级。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Sep 14;4(3):e108. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6187.
5
Establishing visit priorities for complex patients: A summary of the literature and conceptual model to guide innovative interventions.确定复杂患者的就诊优先级:文献综述与指导创新干预措施的概念模型
Healthc (Amst). 2013 Dec;1(3-4):117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.07.008.
6
Human factors in computing systems: focus on patient-centered health communication at the ACM SIGCHI conference.计算系统中的人为因素:在ACM SIGCHI会议上聚焦以患者为中心的健康沟通
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):532-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.017. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
7
Concern about security and privacy, and perceived control over collection and use of health information are related to withholding of health information from healthcare providers.人们对安全和隐私的担忧,以及对健康信息收集和使用的感知控制,与向医疗保健提供者隐瞒健康信息有关。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):374-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002079. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
8
Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity.患有多种慢性病的老年人护理指导原则:临床医生的方法:美国老年医学会患有多种慢性病的老年人护理专家小组
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):E1-E25. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04188.x. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
9
Prioritization of care in adults with diabetes and comorbidity.成年人糖尿病合并症的护理优先级。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Dec;1243:69-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06316.x.
10
Catalyzing Social Support for Breast Cancer Patients.促进对乳腺癌患者的社会支持。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2010 Apr;2010:173-182. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753353.

为患者价值观在临床对话中得以呈现创造条件:医疗团队成员的观点

Creating Conditions for Patients' Values to Emerge in Clinical Conversations: Perspectives of Health Care Team Members.

作者信息

Berry Andrew B L, Lim Catherine, Hartzler Andrea L, Hirsch Tad, Ludman Evette, Wagner Edward H, Ralston James D

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health, Research Institute, Seattle, WA USA.

出版信息

DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf). 2017 Jun;2017:1165-1174. doi: 10.1145/3064663.3064669.

DOI:10.1145/3064663.3064669
PMID:28890950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5589444/
Abstract

Eliciting, understanding, and honoring patients' values- the things most important to them in daily life-is a cornerstone of patient-centered care. However, this rarely occurs explicitly as a routine part of clinical practice. This is particularly problematic for individuals with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) because they face difficult choices about how to balance competing demands for self-care in accordance with their values. In this study, we sought to inform the design of interventions to support conversations about patient values between patients with MCC and their health care providers. We conducted a field study that included observations of 21 clinic visits for patients who have MCC, and interviews with 16 care team members involved in those visits. This paper contributes a practice-based account of ways in which providers engage with patient values, and discusses how future work in interactive systems design might extend and enrich these engagements.

摘要

引出、理解并尊重患者的价值观——即他们日常生活中最重要的事情——是以患者为中心的医疗护理的基石。然而,这很少作为临床实践的常规部分明确发生。这对患有多种慢性病(MCC)的个体来说尤其成问题,因为他们面临着如何根据自身价值观平衡自我护理的相互冲突需求的艰难选择。在本研究中,我们旨在为支持MCC患者与其医疗服务提供者之间关于患者价值观的对话的干预措施设计提供信息。我们进行了一项实地研究,其中包括对21名患有MCC的患者的门诊进行观察,以及对参与这些门诊的16名护理团队成员进行访谈。本文基于实践阐述了医疗服务提供者与患者价值观互动的方式,并讨论了交互式系统设计未来的工作如何可能扩展和丰富这些互动。