Shahabpoor Erfan, Pavic Aleksandar
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
INSIGNEO Institute for In-Silico Medicine, Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Frederick Mappin Building, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK.
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Sep 12;17(9):2085. doi: 10.3390/s17092085.
Monitoring natural human gait in real-life environments is essential in many applications, including quantification of disease progression, monitoring the effects of treatment, and monitoring alteration of performance biomarkers in professional sports. Nevertheless, developing reliable and practical techniques and technologies necessary for continuous real-life monitoring of gait is still an open challenge. A systematic review of English-language articles from scientific databases including Scopus, ScienceDirect, Pubmed, IEEE Xplore, EBSCO and MEDLINE were carried out to analyse the 'accuracy' and 'practicality' of the current techniques and technologies for quantitative measurement of the tri-axial walking ground reactions outside the laboratory environment, and to highlight their strengths and shortcomings. In total, 679 relevant abstracts were identified, 54 full-text papers were included in the paper and the quantitative results of 17 papers were used for meta-analysis and comparison. Three classes of methods were reviewed: (1) methods based on measured kinematic data; (2) methods based on measured plantar pressure; and (3) methods based on direct measurement of ground reactions. It was found that all three classes of methods have competitive accuracy levels with methods based on direct measurement of the ground reactions showing highest accuracy while being least practical for long-term real-life measurement. On the other hand, methods that estimate ground reactions using measured body kinematics show highest practicality of the three classes of methods reviewed. Among the most prominent technical and technological challenges are: (1) reducing the size and price of tri-axial load-cells; (2) improving the accuracy of orientation measurement using IMUs; (3) minimizing the number and optimizing the location of required IMUs for kinematic measurement; (4) increasing the durability of pressure insole sensors, and (5) enhancing the robustness and versatility of the ground reactions estimation methods to include pathological gaits and natural variability of gait in real-life physical environment.
在许多应用中,监测现实生活环境中的自然人类步态至关重要,包括疾病进展的量化、治疗效果的监测以及职业体育中性能生物标志物变化的监测。然而,开发用于步态连续现实生活监测所需的可靠且实用的技术仍然是一个悬而未决的挑战。我们对来自包括Scopus、ScienceDirect、Pubmed、IEEE Xplore、EBSCO和MEDLINE在内的科学数据库的英文文章进行了系统综述,以分析当前用于实验室环境外三轴行走地面反应定量测量的技术和方法的“准确性”和“实用性”,并突出它们的优点和缺点。总共识别出679篇相关摘要,本文纳入了54篇全文论文,并使用17篇论文的定量结果进行荟萃分析和比较。综述了三类方法:(1)基于测量运动学数据的方法;(2)基于测量足底压力的方法;(3)基于地面反应直接测量的方法。结果发现,所有三类方法都具有相当的准确性水平,其中基于地面反应直接测量的方法准确性最高,但对于长期现实生活测量最不实用。另一方面,使用测量的身体运动学估计地面反应的方法在所综述的三类方法中实用性最高。最突出的技术挑战包括:(1)减小三轴测力传感器的尺寸和价格;(2)提高使用惯性测量单元(IMU)进行方向测量的准确性;(3)最小化运动学测量所需IMU的数量并优化其位置;(4)提高压力鞋垫传感器的耐用性;以及(5)增强地面反应估计方法的鲁棒性和通用性,以包括病理步态和现实生活物理环境中步态的自然变异性。