Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Dec;146(12):1694-1704. doi: 10.1037/xge0000363. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Anxiety can be an adaptive response to potentially threatening situations. However, if experienced in inappropriate contexts, it can also lead to pathological and maladaptive anxiety disorders. Experimentally, anxiety can be induced in healthy individuals using the threat of shock (ToS) paradigm. Accumulating work with this paradigm suggests that anxiety promotes harm-avoidant mechanisms through enhanced inhibitory control. However, the specific cognitive mechanisms underlying anxiety-linked inhibitory control are unclear. Critically, behavioral inhibition can arise from at least 2 interacting valuation systems: instrumental (a goal-directed system) and Pavlovian (a "hardwired" reflexive system). The present study (N = 62) replicated a study showing improved response inhibition under ToS in healthy participants, and additionally examined the impact of ToS on aversive and appetitive Pavlovian-instrumental interactions in a reinforced go/no-go task. When Pavlovian and instrumental systems were in conflict, ToS increased inhibition to aversive events, while leaving appetitive interactions unperturbed. We argue that anxiety promotes avoidant behavior in potentially harmful situations by potentiating aversive Pavlovian reactions (i.e., promoting avoidance in the face of threats). Critically, such a mechanism would drive adaptive harm-avoidant behavior in threatening situations where Pavlovian and instrumental processes are aligned, but at the same time, result in maladaptive behaviors when misaligned and where instrumental control would be advantageous. This has important implications for our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie pathological anxiety. (PsycINFO Database Record
焦虑可以是对潜在威胁情境的适应性反应。然而,如果在不适当的情境中体验,它也可能导致病理性和适应不良的焦虑障碍。在实验中,可以使用电击威胁范式(ToS)在健康个体中诱发焦虑。使用该范式的大量研究工作表明,焦虑通过增强抑制控制来促进回避性机制。然而,与焦虑相关的抑制控制的具体认知机制尚不清楚。至关重要的是,行为抑制至少可以源自两个相互作用的估值系统:工具性(有目标导向的系统)和巴甫洛夫(“硬连线”反射系统)。本研究(N=62)复制了一项研究,该研究表明健康参与者在 ToS 下的反应抑制得到改善,并且还在强化的 Go/No-Go 任务中检查了 ToS 对厌恶和奖赏性巴甫洛夫-工具性相互作用的影响。当巴甫洛夫和工具性系统发生冲突时,ToS 会增强对厌恶事件的抑制,而不影响奖赏性相互作用。我们认为,焦虑通过增强厌恶的巴甫洛夫反应来促进潜在有害情况下的回避行为(即,面对威胁时促进回避)。至关重要的是,这种机制将在巴甫洛夫和工具性过程一致的威胁情境中驱动适应性的回避行为,但在不匹配且工具性控制有利的情况下,会导致适应性不良的行为。这对我们理解病理性焦虑的机制具有重要意义。