a Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health , Indiana University , Bloomington , IN , USA and.
b Occupational and Environmental Health , College of Public Health, The University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Feb;57(2):124-134. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1374568. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Adolescent farmworkers are exposed to loud noise during farm activities. We present a prospective study that evaluated the efficacy of low-cost, technology-based intervention approaches in high schools to enhance the use of hearing protection among adolescent farmworkers.
Six high schools in Iowa that agreed to participate in the study were divided into three equal groups through cluster-randomisation with each group receiving one of the three formats of hearing protection intervention: (a) classroom training, (b) classroom training coupled with smartphone app training and (c) computer training. Participants completed baseline (pre-training) and six-week post-intervention surveys for assessing hearing protection knowledge, attitudes and behaviour.
Seventy participants from six schools were initially enrolled but 50 completed both pre- and post-intervention surveys.
In most cases, all three groups showed significant improvement in hearing protection knowledge, attitude and frequency of use from pre- to post-intervention. However, changes between groups were statistically non-significant.
Although all three formats led to improvements on hearing protection knowledge, attitude and behaviour, the findings of the study, perhaps due to the small sample size, did not allow us to detect whether technology-based hearing protection interventions were more effective than the traditional face-to-face training for adolescent farmworkers.
青少年农场工人在农场活动中会接触到很大的噪音。我们提出了一项前瞻性研究,评估了在高中采用低成本、基于技术的干预措施来提高青少年农场工人使用听力保护装置的效果。
爱荷华州的六所同意参与研究的高中通过聚类随机分组分为三组,每组接受三种听力保护干预方式之一:(a)课堂培训,(b)课堂培训加智能手机应用程序培训,(c)计算机培训。参与者完成基线(培训前)和六周后的干预调查,以评估听力保护知识、态度和行为。
最初有 70 名来自六所学校的参与者入学,但只有 50 名完成了前测和后测调查。
在大多数情况下,所有三组在听力保护知识、态度和使用频率方面都从培训前到培训后都有显著提高。然而,组间变化在统计学上没有显著差异。
尽管所有三种模式都导致了听力保护知识、态度和行为的改善,但由于样本量小,研究结果使我们无法确定基于技术的听力保护干预是否比传统的面对面培训对青少年农场工人更有效。