Fernández-Barat Laia, Motos Ana, Ranzani Otavio T, Bassi Gianluigi Li, Aguilera Xiol Elisabet, Senussi Tarek, Travierso Chiara, Chiurazzi Chiara, Idone Francesco, Muñoz Laura, Vila Jordi, Ferrer Miquel, Pelosi Paolo, Blasi Francesco, Antonelli Massimo, Torres Antoni
Centro de Investigación Biomedica En Red-Enfermedades Respiratorias (CibeRes, CB06/06/0028), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Agust Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Microorganisms. 2017 Sep 20;5(3):62. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5030062.
Microorganisms are able to form biofilms within respiratory secretions. Methods to disaggregate such biofilms before utilizing standard, rapid, or high throughput diagnostic technologies may aid in pathogen detection during ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) diagnosis. Our aim was to determine if sonication of endotracheal aspirates (ETA) would increase the sensitivity of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative bacterial cultures in an animal model of pneumonia caused by or by methicillin resistant (MRSA).
or MRSA was instilled into the lungs or the oropharynx of pigs in order to induce severe VAP. Time point assessments for qualitative and quantitative bacterial cultures of ETA and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were performed at 24, 48, and 72 h after bacterial instillation. In addition, at 72 h (autopsy), lung tissue was harvested to perform quantitative bacterial cultures. Each ETA sample was microbiologically processed with and without applying sonication for 5 min at 40 KHz before bacterial cultures. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using BAL as a gold-standard. Correlation with BAL and lung bacterial burden was also determined before and after sonication. Assessment of biofilm clusters and planktonic bacteria was performed through both optical microscopy utilizing Gram staining and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy utilizing the LIVE/DEADLight kit.
33 pigs were included, 27 and 6 from and MRSA pneumonia models, respectively. Overall, we obtained 85 ETA, 69 (81.2%) from and 16 (18.8%) from MRSA challenged pigs. Qualitative cultures did not significantly change after sonication, whereas quantitative ETA cultures did significantly increase bacterial counting. Indeed, sonication consistently increased bacterial burden in ETAs at 24, 48, and 72 h after bacterial challenge. Sonication also improved sensitivity of ETA quantitative cultures and maintained specificity at levels previously reported and accepted for VAP diagnosis.
The use of sonication in ETA respiratory samples needs to be clinically validated since sonication could potentially improve pathogen detection before standard, rapid, or high throughput diagnostic methods used in routine microbial diagnostics.
微生物能够在呼吸道分泌物中形成生物膜。在使用标准、快速或高通量诊断技术之前,分解此类生物膜的方法可能有助于在呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)诊断期间检测病原体。我们的目的是确定气管内吸出物(ETA)的超声处理是否会提高由肺炎克雷伯菌或耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的肺炎动物模型中定性、半定量和定量细菌培养的敏感性。
将肺炎克雷伯菌或MRSA注入猪的肺部或口咽部以诱导严重的VAP。在细菌注入后24、48和72小时对ETA和支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)样本进行定性和定量细菌培养的时间点评估。此外,在72小时(尸检)时,采集肺组织进行定量细菌培养。在进行细菌培养之前,每个ETA样本在有和没有以40千赫超声处理5分钟的情况下进行微生物学处理。以BAL作为金标准确定敏感性和特异性。还确定了超声处理前后与BAL和肺部细菌负荷的相关性。通过使用革兰氏染色的光学显微镜和使用LIVE/DEAD荧光试剂盒的共聚焦激光扫描显微镜对生物膜簇和浮游细菌进行评估。
共纳入33头猪,分别来自肺炎克雷伯菌和MRSA肺炎模型的有27头和6头。总体而言,我们获得了85份ETA样本,其中69份(81.2%)来自肺炎克雷伯菌攻击的猪,16份(18.8%)来自MRSA攻击的猪。超声处理后定性培养没有显著变化,而定量ETA培养确实显著增加了细菌计数。事实上,超声处理在细菌攻击后24、48和72小时持续增加了ETA中的细菌负荷。超声处理还提高了ETA定量培养的敏感性,并将特异性维持在先前报道的和被接受用于VAP诊断的水平。
由于超声处理可能会在常规微生物诊断中使用的标准、快速或高通量诊断方法之前提高病原体检测,因此ETA呼吸道样本中超声处理的应用需要进行临床验证。