Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
IDISNA (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra), Pamplona, Spain.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 28;6(10):e005705. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005705.
Metabolomics is a promising tool of cardiovascular biomarker discovery. We systematically reviewed the literature on comprehensive metabolomic profiling in association with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD).
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to January 2016. Studies were eligible if they pertained to adult humans; followed an agnostic and/or comprehensive approach; used serum or plasma (not urine or other biospecimens); conducted metabolite profiling at baseline in the context of examining prospective disease; and included myocardial infarction, stroke, and/or CVD death in the CVD outcome definition. We identified 12 original articles (9 cohort and 3 nested case-control studies); participant numbers ranged from 67 to 7256. Mass spectrometry was the predominant analytical method. The number and chemical diversity of metabolites were very heterogeneous, ranging from 31 to >10 000 features. Four studies used untargeted profiling. Different types of metabolites were associated with CVD risk: acylcarnitines, dicarboxylacylcarnitines, and several amino acids and lipid classes. Only tiny improvements in CVD prediction beyond traditional risk factors were observed using these metabolites (C index improvement ranged from 0.006 to 0.05).
There are a limited number of longitudinal studies assessing associations between comprehensive metabolomic profiles and CVD risk. Quantitatively synthesizing the literature is challenging because of the widely varying analytical tools and the diversity of methodological and statistical approaches. Although some results are promising, more research is needed, notably standardization of metabolomic techniques and statistical approaches. Replication and combinations of novel and holistic methodological approaches would move the field toward the realization of its promise.
代谢组学是发现心血管生物标志物的一种很有前途的工具。我们系统地综述了与心血管疾病(CVD)发病相关的综合代谢组学分析的文献。
我们检索了 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 从建库到 2016 年 1 月的数据。如果研究符合以下条件,则被认为是合格的:涉及成年人群;采用了未知或全面的方法;使用血清或血浆(非尿液或其他生物标本);在前瞻性疾病检查中进行了基线代谢产物分析;以及 CVD 结局定义中包含心肌梗死、中风和/或 CVD 死亡。我们共鉴定了 12 篇原始文献(9 项队列研究和 3 项巢式病例对照研究);参与者人数从 67 到 7256 不等。质谱法是主要的分析方法。代谢物的数量和化学多样性非常不同,范围从 31 到>10000 个特征。有 4 项研究使用了非靶向分析。不同类型的代谢物与 CVD 风险相关:酰基肉碱、二羧酸酰基肉碱和几种氨基酸和脂质类。使用这些代谢物,除了传统的危险因素外,CVD 预测的改善非常小(C 指数改善范围从 0.006 到 0.05)。
目前评估综合代谢组学分析与 CVD 风险之间关系的纵向研究数量有限。由于分析工具广泛不同以及方法学和统计学方法的多样性,定量综合文献具有挑战性。虽然有些结果很有希望,但还需要更多的研究,特别是代谢组学技术和统计方法的标准化。复制和结合新的和整体的方法学方法将推动该领域实现其潜力。