Suppr超能文献

急性 A 型主动脉夹层手术后再手术的结果:对指数修复策略的影响。

Outcomes of Reoperation After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Implications for Index Repair Strategy.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 3;6(10):e006376. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006376.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for management of acute type A aortic dissection remains controversial. This study aimed to assess outcomes of reoperation after acute type A dissection repair to help guide decision making around index operative strategy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All aortic reoperations (n=129) at a single referral institution from August 2005 to April 2016 after prior acute type A dissection repair were reviewed. The primary outcome was 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ-specific morbidity and 1- and 5-year outcomes as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The majority of initial reoperations were proximal aortic (aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending) or aortic arch procedures (62.5%, n=55); most initial reoperations were performed in the elective setting (83.1%, n=74). Additional nonstaged second or more reoperations were required in 21 patients (23.6%) after the initial reoperation, during a median follow-up of 2.5 years after the initial reoperation. Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality for all reoperations was 7.0% (elective: 6.3%; nonelective: 11.1%) with acceptable rates of organ-specific morbidity, given the procedural complexity. One- and 5-year overall survival after initial reoperation was 85.9% and 64.9%, respectively, with aorta-specific survival of 88% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation after acute type A aortic dissection repair is associated with low rates of mortality and morbidity. These data support more limited index repair for acute type A dissection, especially for patients undergoing index repair in lower volume centers without expertise in extensive repair, because reoperations, if needed, can be performed safely in referral aortic centers.

摘要

背景

急性 A 型主动脉夹层的最佳手术入路仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估急性 A 型夹层修复后的再手术结果,以帮助指导指数手术策略的决策。

方法和结果

回顾了 2005 年 8 月至 2016 年 4 月期间在一家转诊机构进行的急性 A 型夹层修复后所有主动脉再手术(n=129)。主要结局为 30 天或住院死亡率。次要结局包括特定器官的发病率以及使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计的 1 年和 5 年结局。最初的再手术大多数为近端主动脉(主动脉瓣、主动脉根部或升主动脉)或主动脉弓手术(62.5%,n=55);大多数最初的再手术是在择期进行的(83.1%,n=74)。在初始再手术中位随访 2.5 年后,有 21 名患者(23.6%)需要进行非分期的第二或更多次再手术。所有再手术的 30 天或住院死亡率为 7.0%(择期:6.3%;非择期:11.1%),考虑到手术的复杂性,特定器官的发病率可接受。初始再手术后 1 年和 5 年的总生存率分别为 85.9%和 64.9%,主动脉特异性生存率为 5 年时的 88%。

结论

急性 A 型主动脉夹层修复后的再手术与较低的死亡率和发病率相关。这些数据支持更有限的急性 A 型夹层指数修复,特别是对于在没有广泛修复专业知识的低容量中心接受指数修复的患者,因为如果需要,再手术可以在转诊主动脉中心安全进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a6/5721847/72e6fae55f7e/JAH3-6-e006376-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验