Suppr超能文献

沟通大规模开放空间微生物组和宏基因组研究的承诺、风险和伦理。

Communicating the promise, risks, and ethics of large-scale, open space microbiome and metagenome research.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

出版信息

Microbiome. 2017 Oct 4;5(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0349-4.

Abstract

The public commonly associates microorganisms with pathogens. This suspicion of microorganisms is understandable, as historically microorganisms have killed more humans than any other agent while remaining largely unknown until the late seventeenth century with the works of van Leeuwenhoek and Kircher. Despite our improved understanding regarding microorganisms, the general public are apt to think of diseases rather than of the majority of harmless or beneficial species that inhabit our bodies and the built and natural environment. As long as microbiome research was confined to labs, the public's exposure to microbiology was limited. The recent launch of global microbiome surveys, such as the Earth Microbiome Project and MetaSUB (Metagenomics and Metadesign of Subways and Urban Biomes) project, has raised ethical, financial, feasibility, and sustainability concerns as to the public's level of understanding and potential reaction to the findings, which, done improperly, risk negative implications for ongoing and future investigations, but done correctly, can facilitate a new vision of "smart cities." To facilitate improved future research, we describe here the major concerns that our discussions with ethics committees, community leaders, and government officials have raised, and we expound on how to address them. We further discuss ethical considerations of microbiome surveys and provide practical recommendations for public engagement.

摘要

公众通常将微生物与病原体联系在一起。这种对微生物的怀疑是可以理解的,因为在历史上,微生物在很大程度上是未知的,直到 17 世纪列文虎克和基歇尔的作品问世后,才比任何其他因素杀死了更多的人类。尽管我们对微生物有了更好的了解,但公众往往会想到疾病,而不是那些生活在我们体内以及建筑和自然环境中的大多数无害或有益的物种。只要微生物组研究局限于实验室,公众接触微生物学的机会就有限。最近,全球微生物组调查(如地球微生物组计划和地铁和城市生物群落的宏基因组学和元设计项目)的启动引发了一些伦理、财务、可行性和可持续性方面的担忧,这些担忧涉及公众对调查结果的理解程度和潜在反应,因为如果处理不当,这些担忧可能会对正在进行的和未来的调查产生负面影响,但如果处理得当,则可以为“智慧城市”提供新的视角。为了促进未来研究的改进,我们在这里描述了与伦理委员会、社区领导和政府官员讨论中提出的主要关注点,并阐述了如何解决这些问题。我们进一步讨论了微生物组调查的伦理考虑,并提供了公众参与的实用建议。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Behind the scenes with genomics researchers.基因组学研究人员的幕后故事。
Front Genet. 2024 Dec 12;15:1467404. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1467404. eCollection 2024.
3
6
A history of the MetaSUB consortium: Tracking urban microbes around the globe.MetaSUB联盟的历史:追踪全球城市微生物。
iScience. 2022 Oct 20;25(11):104993. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104993. eCollection 2022 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Nanopore sequencing in microgravity.微重力环境下的纳米孔测序
NPJ Microgravity. 2016 Oct 20;2:16035. doi: 10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.35. eCollection 2016.
5
Living in a microbial world.生活在一个微生物的世界里。
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 May 9;35(5):401-403. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3868.
8
International Standards for Genomes, Transcriptomes, and Metagenomes.基因组、转录组和宏基因组国际标准
J Biomol Tech. 2017 Apr;28(1):8-18. doi: 10.7171/jbt.17-2801-006. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验