Isenberg H D, Giugliano E R, France K, Alperstein P
Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 11042.
J Hosp Infect. 1988 Apr;11(3):278-85. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90106-5.
Solutions of 2.0% and 3.4% glutaraldehyde, and of 0.5% phenate with 0.18% glutaraldehyde were stressed with a microbial and organic soil load for the periods advocated by the respective manufacturers. The disinfecting efficacy of the stressed solutions was challenged with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), a water Mycobacterium sp. and Candida albicans. The three disinfectants were active against the fast-growing bacteria in appropriate dilutions; lesser dilutions of the glutaraldehyde solutions killed the mycobacteria and the yeast, while stressed phenate with glutaraldehyde did not. One hour exposure of the stressed disinfectants failed to kill the spore preparations while reducing the number of survivors.
2.0%和3.4%的戊二醛溶液,以及含0.18%戊二醛的0.5%酚盐溶液,按照各自制造商推荐的时间,承受微生物和有机土壤负荷。用金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、枯草芽孢杆菌、牛分枝杆菌(卡介苗)、一种水分枝杆菌属菌种和白色念珠菌对承受负荷后的溶液的消毒效果进行挑战试验。这三种消毒剂在适当稀释度下对快速生长的细菌有活性;戊二醛溶液稀释度较低时可杀死分枝杆菌和酵母菌,而含戊二醛的酚盐溶液承受负荷后则不能。承受负荷后的消毒剂暴露1小时未能杀死孢子制剂,但减少了存活菌数。