Lăzăroiu George, Pera Aurel, Ștefănescu-Mihăilă Ramona O, Mircică Nela, Negurită Octav
Department of Social-Human Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Teacher Training, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct 10;11:188. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00188. eCollection 2017.
We draw on outstanding research (Sanfey et al., 2006; McCabe, 2008; Bernheim, 2009; Camerer, 2013; Radu and McClure, 2013; Declerck and Boone, 2016) to substantiate that neuroeconomics covers the investigation of the biological microfoundations of economic cognition and economic conduct, attempts to prove that a superior grasp of how choices are made brings about superior expectations regarding which options are selected, preserves the strictness of economic analysis in defining value-based decision, and associates imaging techniques with economic pattern to explain how individuals decide on a strategy taking into account various possible choices. Neuroeconomics is adequately prepared to regulate the notion of how choices are determined by mental states. The position that will be elaborated in this article is that neuroeconomic patterns are enabled and enhanced in descriptive capacity by psychological outcomes and substantiated in biological processes. Advancement in neuroeconomics takes place when outcomes from distinct procedures are coherent with an ordinary mechanistic clarification of what generates choice, construed by a computational pattern. We will develop this point further by proving that economics improves the concerted effort of neuroeconomics by using its observations in the various results that may stem from the planned and market interplays of diverse participants, and via a series of accurate, explicit, mathematical patterns to construe such interplays and results. Neuroeconomics experiments employ a mixture of brain imaging/stimulation tests advanced in the cognitive neurosciences and microeconomic systems/game theory tests advanced in the economic sciences. Our analyses indicate that neuroeconomics aims to employ the supplementary input gained from brain investigations, associated with the decision maker's selection, with the purpose of better grasping the cogitation process and to utilize the outcomes to enhance economic patterns.
我们借鉴了杰出的研究成果(桑菲等人,2006年;麦凯布,2008年;伯恩海姆,2009年;卡梅勒,2013年;拉杜和麦克卢尔,2013年;德克莱克和布恩,2016年)来证实,神经经济学涵盖了对经济认知和经济行为的生物微观基础的研究,试图证明对选择如何做出有更深入的理解会带来对所选选项有更优的预期,在定义基于价值的决策时保持经济分析的严谨性,并将成像技术与经济模式联系起来,以解释个体如何在考虑各种可能选择的情况下决定策略。神经经济学已充分准备好规范选择如何由心理状态决定这一概念。本文将阐述的观点是,神经经济模式在描述能力上由心理结果促成并增强,在生物过程中得到证实。当不同程序的结果与对产生选择的普通机制性解释相一致时,神经经济学就取得了进展,这种解释由一种计算模式来构建。我们将通过证明经济学利用其在不同参与者的计划和市场相互作用可能产生的各种结果中的观察结果,并通过一系列准确、明确的数学模式来解释这种相互作用和结果,从而改进神经经济学的协同努力,进一步阐述这一点。神经经济学实验采用了认知神经科学中先进的脑成像/刺激测试与经济科学中先进的微观经济系统/博弈论测试的混合方法。我们的分析表明,神经经济学旨在利用从大脑研究中获得的补充性输入,这些输入与决策者的选择相关,以便更好地理解思考过程,并利用这些结果来改进经济模式。