Center for One Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.
Poult Sci. 2018 Jan 1;97(1):271-278. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex275.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in poultry meat are a threat to public health. In this study, we compared the Enterococcus spp. loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles between carcasses of conventionally and organically raised chickens. A total of 144 chicken carcasses (72 conventional and 72 organic) was collected from local retail markets in Seoul, South Korea. Overall, 77.7% (112 of 144; 75% conventional and 80% organic) of chicken carcasses were positive for Enterococcus. The mean loads of Enterococcus spp. were greater in conventional chicken carcasses, at 2.9 ± 0.4 log CFU/mL, than those in organic chicken carcasses, at 1.78 ± 0.3 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05). A total of 104 isolates (52 from conventional and 52 from organic chicken carcasses) was randomly selected for further analysis. The predominant species was Enterococcus faecalis in both conventional and organic chicken carcasses (57.7 and 76.9%, respectively; P > 0.05). Rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin, which are used in veterinary medicine in South Korea, were significantly higher in conventional chicken carcasses than in organic chicken carcasses. However, we found no difference between the rates of resistance to antibiotics such as vancomycin and tigecycline, which were not registered for use in veterinary medicine in South Korea, of Enterococcus isolates from conventional and organic chicken carcasses. In addition, although multidrug resistant isolates were obtained from both types of chicken samples, the prevalence of samples positive for Enterococcus was significantly higher in conventional chicken carcasses than in organic chicken carcasses (P < 0.05). The most common multidrug resistance pattern was erythromycin-tetracycline-rifampicin in conventional chicken carcasses and quinupristin-dalfopristin-tetracycline-rifampicin in organic chicken carcasses. A high level of gentamicin resistance was observed in isolates from not only conventional (5.8%) but also organic chicken (1.9%) carcasses, with no significant difference in rates between them (P > 0.05). Despite this, our results suggest that organic food certification is effective in reducing fecal contamination and the burden of antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus spp. in chicken carcasses.
禽肉中的耐药细菌对公共健康构成威胁。在这项研究中,我们比较了常规饲养和有机饲养鸡肉中的肠球菌负荷和耐药谱。从韩国首尔的当地零售市场共采集了 144 个鸡胴体(72 个常规鸡和 72 个有机鸡)。总的来说,144 个鸡胴体中有 77.7%(112 个为阳性;75%为常规鸡,80%为有机鸡)检测到肠球菌。常规鸡胴体中的肠球菌负荷平均值较高,为 2.9±0.4 log CFU/mL,而有机鸡胴体中的肠球菌负荷平均值较低,为 1.78±0.3 log CFU/mL(p<0.05)。随机选择了 104 株分离株(52 株来自常规鸡,52 株来自有机鸡)进行进一步分析。在常规鸡和有机鸡胴体中,主要的种均为粪肠球菌(分别为 57.7%和 76.9%;P>0.05)。对在韩国兽医临床上使用的环丙沙星和红霉素的耐药率在常规鸡胴体中明显高于有机鸡胴体。然而,我们发现常规鸡和有机鸡胴体中的肠球菌分离株对未在韩国兽医临床上注册使用的万古霉素和替加环素等抗生素的耐药率没有差异。此外,虽然从两种类型的鸡样本中都获得了多药耐药分离株,但常规鸡胴体中肠球菌阳性样本的比例明显高于有机鸡胴体(P<0.05)。常规鸡胴体中最常见的多药耐药模式为红霉素-四环素-利福平,而有机鸡胴体中则为奎奴普丁-达福普汀-四环素-利福平。常规鸡(5.8%)和有机鸡(1.9%)胴体中的分离株均表现出高水平的庆大霉素耐药性,两者之间的耐药率无显著差异(P>0.05)。尽管如此,我们的研究结果表明,有机食品认证可有效降低鸡胴体中的粪便污染和耐药肠球菌负荷。