Mansfield Michael, Thacker Michael, Sandford Fiona
1 London South Bank University, UK.
2 University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Hand (N Y). 2018 Sep;13(5):501-508. doi: 10.1177/1558944717736398. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb. Research has shown that associative factors for CTS include occupational and biomechanical elements, sex, and age. To date, no systematic review has been undertaken to determine specifically whether there are any psychosocial risk factors in developing CTS. The objective is to determine whether psychosocial factors are associated with and/or predict the development of CTS.
A systematic review was conducted including searches of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception to May 30, 2017. Quantitative studies must have investigated a minimum of 1 or more psychosocial factors-cognitive, affective, behavioral, vocational, or interpersonal processes (eg, social support)-and include a point or risk estimate. One reviewer conducted the search and 2 reviewers independently assessed eligibility and completed methodological quality assessment using a modified Downs and Black checklist. Data were analyzed narratively.
Six moderate- to high-quality studies were included in the final review. Five studies reported a positive association between psychosocial factors and CTS, where psychosocial factors were more in those who reported CTS. One study reported no positive or negative association with CTS development. Four studies reported a negative association between psychosocial factors and CTS, where psychosocial factors were less in those who reported CTS.
There is limited evidence for a positive association between psychosocial factors and CTS. However, this was not a consistent finding across all included studies. Further research is indicated in standardizing CTS diagnostic criteria and investigating other working environments.
腕管综合征(CTS)是上肢最常见的卡压性神经病变。研究表明,CTS的相关因素包括职业和生物力学因素、性别及年龄。迄今为止,尚未进行系统评价以明确CTS发病是否存在任何社会心理危险因素。目的是确定社会心理因素是否与CTS的发生相关及/或能否预测CTS的发生。
进行一项系统评价,检索了自数据库建库至2017年5月30日的PubMed(MEDLINE)、EMBASE和CINAHL。定量研究必须至少调查1种或更多社会心理因素——认知、情感、行为、职业或人际过程(如社会支持),并包括一个点估计或风险估计。由一名评价者进行检索,两名评价者独立评估纳入标准,并使用改良的唐斯和布莱克清单完成方法学质量评估。对数据进行叙述性分析。
最终评价纳入6项中高质量研究。5项研究报告社会心理因素与CTS之间存在正相关,即报告有CTS的人群中社会心理因素更多。1项研究报告与CTS的发生无正相关或负相关。4项研究报告社会心理因素与CTS之间存在负相关,即报告有CTS的人群中社会心理因素较少。
社会心理因素与CTS之间存在正相关的证据有限。然而,并非所有纳入研究均一致得出这一结果。需要进一步研究以规范CTS诊断标准并调查其他工作环境。