Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Jul 1;13(6):750-754. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0379. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
To validate the quantification of training load (session rating of perceived exertion [s-RPE]) in an Australian Olympic squad (women's water polo), assessed with the use of a modified RPE scale collected via a newly developed online system (athlete management system).
Sixteen elite women water polo players (age = 26 [3] y, height = 1.78 [0.05] m, and body mass = 75.5 [7.1] kg) participated in the study. Thirty training sessions were monitored for a total of 303 individual sessions. Heart rate was recorded during training sessions using continuous heart-rate telemetry. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of the training sessions on the athlete management system RPE scale, using an online application within 30 min of completion of the sessions. Individual relationships between s-RPE and both Banister training impulse (TRIMP) and Edwards' method were analyzed.
Individual correlations with s-RPE ranged between r = .51 and .79 (Banister TRIMP) and r = .54 and .83 (Edwards' method). The percentages of moderate and large correlation were 81% and 19% between s-RPE method and Banister TRIMP, and 56% and 44% between s-RPE and Edwards' method.
The online athlete management system for assessing s-RPE was shown to be a valid indicator of internal training load and can be used in elite sport.
验证一种经改良的 RPE 量表（运动员管理系统）的在线系统收集的训练负荷（主观感觉疲劳评分[s-RPE]）在澳大利亚奥林匹克队伍（女子水球）中的量化评估的有效性。
16 名精英女子水球运动员（年龄=26[3]岁，身高=1.78[0.05]米，体重=75.5[7.1]公斤）参与了研究。共监测了 30 次训练，总计 303 个独立训练。在训练期间使用连续心率遥测记录心率。参与者被要求在完成训练后 30 分钟内，通过运动员管理系统 RPE 量表在线应用程序评估训练的强度。分析 s-RPE 与 Banister 训练冲击（TRIMP）和 Edwards 方法的个体关系。
s-RPE 与 Banister TRIMP 的个体相关性在 r=0.51 到 r=0.79 之间，与 Edwards 方法的个体相关性在 r=0.54 到 r=0.83 之间。s-RPE 与 Banister TRIMP 之间中度和高度相关的比例分别为 81%和 19%，s-RPE 与 Edwards 方法之间中度和高度相关的比例分别为 56%和 44%。
评估 s-RPE 的在线运动员管理系统被证明是内部训练负荷的有效指标，可用于精英运动。
