Suppr超能文献

从我们的患者了解情况:用于腭裂手术评估的PPOPS评分/一项试点研究

Let's know from our patients: PPOPS score for palate surgery evaluation/a pilot study.

作者信息

Rashwan Mohamed S, Montevecchi Filippo, Firinua Elisabetta, Dachuri Sandeep, Obaidat Hayfa, Gobbi Riccardo, Cammaroto Giovanni, Nuzzo Simona, Vicini Claudio

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of medicine, Suez Canal University Teaching Hospitals, Ismailia, Egypt.

Head and Neck Department, ENT and Oral Surgery Unit, G.B. Morgagni-L. Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, ASL of Romagna, Romagna, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan;275(1):287-291. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4795-1. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

Abstract

AIM

To introduce a questionnaire that can be used to assess the post-operative perception of the patients after palatal surgery. The questionnaire was named: Palate Post-Operative Problems Score (PPOPS).

STUDY DESIGN

Pilot study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was performed at Morgagni-Pierantoni hospital, Forli. Forty patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who performed either expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) or barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (BRP) in our hospital were divided into two groups, 20 patients per group. The patients' answers to the PPOPS questionnaire were recorded and their total scores were compared in addition to each item separately. PPOPS questionnaire consists of 12 items scored from 0 to 3 with a total score from 0 to 36.

RESULTS

The overall average scores between both groups were similar being 4.05 for the BRP and 4.35 for the ESP with P value 0.4. From the results of the questionnaire, the patients favoured choosing BRP than ESP although some items showed better results among ESP patients and the difference between both techniques is not statistically significant. Every item score was separately compared and described in details later in the results.

CONCLUSION

PPOPS questionnaire can be an additional useful tool for the assessment of any kind of palatal surgery through detailed analysis of the patients' perception for their surgery. BRP and ESP are similar procedures in the idea and results.

摘要

目的

介绍一种可用于评估腭部手术后患者术后感受的问卷。该问卷名为:腭部术后问题评分(PPOPS)。

研究设计

试点研究。

患者与方法

本研究在弗利的莫尔加尼 - 皮耶兰托尼医院进行。40例患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)且在我院接受了扩张括约肌咽成形术(ESP)或倒刺复位咽成形术(BRP)的患者被分为两组,每组20例。记录患者对PPOPS问卷的回答,并分别比较每个项目以及总分。PPOPS问卷由12个项目组成,评分从0到3,总分从0到36。

结果

两组的总体平均分相似,BRP组为4.05,ESP组为4.35,P值为0.4。从问卷结果来看,尽管某些项目在ESP患者中显示出更好的结果,但患者更倾向于选择BRP而非ESP,且两种技术之间的差异无统计学意义。每个项目的得分将在结果中分别进行比较和详细描述。

结论

PPOPS问卷通过详细分析患者对手术的感受,可成为评估任何类型腭部手术的一个有用补充工具。BRP和ESP在理念和结果上相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验