• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地震后寨卡病毒激增:气候适宜条件下的灾难与公共卫生威胁

Post-earthquake Zika virus surge: Disaster and public health threat amid climatic conduciveness.

作者信息

Reina Ortiz Miguel, Le Nicole K, Sharma Vinita, Hoare Ismael, Quizhpe Edy, Teran Enrique, Naik Eknath, Salihu Hamisu M, Izurieta Ricardo

机构信息

Department of Global Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Fundación Raíces, Esmeraldas, Ecuador.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15706-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15706-w
PMID:29133932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5684400/
Abstract

A recent major earthquake (M7.8), coupled with appropriate climatic conditions, led to significant destruction in Ecuador. Temperature variations, which may be induced by anthropogenic climate change, are often associated with changes in rainfall, humidity and pressure. Temperature and humidity are associated with ecological modifications that may favour mosquito breeding. We hypothesized that the disruptive ecological changes triggered by the earthquake, in the context of appropriate climatic conditions, led to an upsurge in Zika virus (ZIKV) infections. Here we show that, after controlling for climatic and socioeconomic conditions, earthquake severity was associated with incident ZIKV cases. Pre-earthquake mean maximum monthly temperature and post-earthquake mean monthly pressure were negatively associated with ZIKV incidence rates. These results demonstrate the dynamics of post-disaster vector-borne disease transmission, in the context of conducive/favourable climatic conditions, which are relevant in a climate change-affected world where disasters may occur in largely populated areas.

摘要

最近发生的一次大地震(7.8级),加上适宜的气候条件,给厄瓜多尔造成了重大破坏。温度变化可能由人为气候变化引起,通常与降雨、湿度和气压的变化有关。温度和湿度与可能有利于蚊子繁殖的生态变化有关。我们假设,在适宜的气候条件下,地震引发的破坏性生态变化导致了寨卡病毒(ZIKV)感染的激增。在此我们表明,在控制了气候和社会经济条件后,地震严重程度与寨卡病毒病例的发生有关。震前月平均最高温度和震后月平均气压与寨卡病毒发病率呈负相关。这些结果证明了在有利的气候条件下灾后媒介传播疾病的传播动态,这在一个受气候变化影响、可能在人口密集地区发生灾害的世界中具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/1887bdc4330e/41598_2017_15706_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/5e4422cc2eae/41598_2017_15706_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/c2ea57854cce/41598_2017_15706_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/ea596fa36777/41598_2017_15706_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/09557470f01f/41598_2017_15706_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/1887bdc4330e/41598_2017_15706_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/5e4422cc2eae/41598_2017_15706_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/c2ea57854cce/41598_2017_15706_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/ea596fa36777/41598_2017_15706_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/09557470f01f/41598_2017_15706_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfa7/5684400/1887bdc4330e/41598_2017_15706_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Post-earthquake Zika virus surge: Disaster and public health threat amid climatic conduciveness.地震后寨卡病毒激增:气候适宜条件下的灾难与公共卫生威胁
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15706-w.
2
An overview of mosquito vectors of Zika virus.寨卡病毒的蚊媒概述。
Microbes Infect. 2018 Dec;20(11-12):646-660. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
An Ecological Assessment of the Pandemic Threat of Zika Virus.寨卡病毒大流行威胁的生态评估
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Aug 26;10(8):e0004968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004968. eCollection 2016 Aug.
4
Modes of Transmission of Zika Virus.寨卡病毒传播方式。
J Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 16;216(suppl_10):S875-S883. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix396.
5
Zika virus outbreak in the Pacific: Vector competence of regional vectors.太平洋地区的 Zika 病毒爆发:区域传播媒介的媒介效能。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jul 17;12(7):e0006637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006637. eCollection 2018 Jul.
6
Naturally infected Aedes aegypti collected during a Zika virus outbreak have viral titres consistent with transmission.在寨卡病毒疫情期间采集的自然感染埃及伊蚊的病毒滴度与传播情况相符。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8(1):242-244. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2018.1561157.
7
Differential transmission of Asian and African Zika virus lineages by Aedes aegypti from New Caledonia.新喀里多尼亚埃及伊蚊对亚洲和非洲寨卡病毒谱系的差异传播。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018 Sep 26;7(1):159. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0166-2.
8
Evidence for infection but not transmission of Zika virus by Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Spain.证据表明,西班牙白纹伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)可感染寨卡病毒但不会传播该病毒。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 May 3;12(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3467-y.
9
Zika virus: An updated review of competent or naturally infected mosquitoes.寨卡病毒:对有传播能力或自然感染的蚊子的最新综述。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Nov 16;11(11):e0005933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005933. eCollection 2017 Nov.
10
Surveillance on the endemic of Zika virus infection by meteorological factors in Colombia: a population-based spatial and temporal study.哥伦比亚气象因素与寨卡病毒感染地方性流行的监测:基于人群的时空研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 17;18(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3085-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Autoimmune Diseases Following Environmental Disasters: A Narrative Review of the Literature.环境灾难后的自身免疫性疾病:文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;12(17):1767. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171767.
2
Impact of wars and natural disasters on emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases.战争和自然灾害对新发和再发传染病的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 1;11:1215929. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1215929. eCollection 2023.
3
The Impact of Earthquakes on Public Health: A Narrative Review of Infectious Diseases in the Post-Disaster Period Aiming to Disaster Risk Reduction.

本文引用的文献

1
Zika and Chikungunya virus detection in naturally infected Aedes aegypti in Ecuador.厄瓜多尔自然感染埃及伊蚊中寨卡病毒和基孔肯雅病毒的检测
Acta Trop. 2018 Jan;177:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.09.029. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
2
Host outdoor exposure variability affects the transmission and spread of Zika virus: Insights for epidemic control.宿主户外暴露的变异性影响寨卡病毒的传播:对疫情控制的启示。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Sep 14;11(9):e0005851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005851. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
Differential Vector Competency of Populations from the Americas for Zika Virus.
地震对公共卫生的影响:旨在降低灾害风险的灾后时期传染病的叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 7;11(2):419. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020419.
4
Impact of the V410L kdr mutation and co-occurring genotypes at kdr sites 1016 and 1534 in the VGSC on the probability of survival of the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.) to Permanone in Harris County, TX, USA.在美国德克萨斯州哈里斯县,V410L kdr 突变以及 VGSC 上 kdr 位点 1016 和 1534 处共存基因型对埃及伊蚊存活至派卡瑞丁的概率的影响。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Jan 23;17(1):e0011033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011033. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Kdr genotyping (V1016I, F1534C) of the Nav channel of Aedes aegypti (L.) mosquito populations in Harris County (Houston), Texas, USA, after Permanone 31-66 field tests and its influence on probability of survival.美国德克萨斯州哈里斯县(休斯顿)伊蚊种群 Nav 通道 Kdr 基因分型(V1016I、F1534C),经 Permanone 31-66 田间试验及其对存活率影响后。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Nov 4;15(11):e0009833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009833. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Association between socio-environmental factors, coverage by family health teams, and rainfall in the spatial distribution of Zika virus infection in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 2015 and 2016.2015年和2016年巴西里约热内卢市寨卡病毒感染空间分布中社会环境因素、家庭健康团队覆盖率与降雨之间的关联
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11249-y.
7
Spatiotemporal Distribution of Zika Virus and Its Spatially Heterogeneous Relationship with the Environment.寨卡病毒的时空分布及其与环境的空间异质性关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 2;18(1):290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010290.
8
Anopheline and human drivers of malaria risk in northern coastal, Ecuador: a pilot study.厄瓜多尔北部沿海地区按蚊和人类对疟疾风险的驱动因素:一项试点研究。
Malar J. 2020 Oct 2;19(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03426-y.
9
Exploring local and global regression models to estimate the spatial variability of Zika and Chikungunya cases in Recife, Brazil.探讨局部和全局回归模型,以估计巴西累西腓寨卡和基孔肯雅热病例的空间变异性。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020 Sep 25;53:e20200027. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0027-2020. eCollection 2020.
10
Climate Change and Women's Health: Impacts and Opportunities in India.气候变化与女性健康:印度的影响与机遇
Geohealth. 2018 Oct 17;2(10):283-297. doi: 10.1029/2018GH000163. eCollection 2018 Oct.
美洲不同人群对寨卡病毒的媒介能力差异
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Aug;97(2):330-339. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0969.
4
Zika virus alters the microRNA expression profile and elicits an RNAi response in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.寨卡病毒改变埃及伊蚊体内的微小RNA表达谱并引发RNA干扰反应。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 17;11(7):e0005760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005760. eCollection 2017 Jul.
5
Impact of the 2016 Ecuador Earthquake on Zika Virus Cases.2016年厄瓜多尔地震对寨卡病毒病例的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jul;107(7):1137-1142. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303769. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
A Malaria Transmission Model with Temperature-Dependent Incubation Period.一种潜伏期与温度相关的疟疾传播模型。
Bull Math Biol. 2017 May;79(5):1155-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11538-017-0276-3. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Assessing spatio-temporal trend of vector breeding and dengue fever incidence in association with meteorological conditions.评估病媒滋生和登革热发病率与气象条件相关的时空趋势。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Apr;189(4):189. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5902-x. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
8
How does the dengue vector mosquito Aedes albopictus respond to global warming?白纹伊蚊如何应对全球变暖?
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Mar 11;10(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2071-2.
9
Natural disaster management: experience of an academic institution after a 7.8 magnitude earthquake in Ecuador.自然灾害管理:厄瓜多尔发生7.8级地震后一所学术机构的经验
Public Health. 2017 Mar;144:134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
10
Household Dengue Prevention Interventions, Expenditures, and Barriers to Aedes aegypti Control in Machala, Ecuador.厄瓜多尔马查拉的家庭登革热预防干预措施、支出及埃及伊蚊控制的障碍
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 16;14(2):196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020196.