Cadet Jean-Maurice, Bencherif Hassan, Portafaix Thierry, Lamy Kévin, Ncongwane Katlego, Coetzee Gerrie J R, Wright Caradee Y
LACy, Laboratoire de l'Atmosphère et des Cyclones (UMR 8105 CNRS, Université de La Réunion, Météo-France), Saint-Denis de La Réunion 97744, France.
School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 14;14(11):1384. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111384.
South Africa has been measuring the ground-based solar UV index for more than two decades at six sites to raise awareness about the impacts of the solar UV index on human health. This paper is an exploratory study based on comparison with satellite UV index measurements from the OMI/AURA experiment. Relative UV index differences between ground-based and satellite-derived data ranged from 0 to 45% depending on the site and year. Most of time, these differences appear in winter. Some ground-based stations' data had closer agreement with satellite-derived data. While the ground-based instruments are not intended for long-term trend analysis, they provide UV index information for public awareness instead, with some weak signs suggesting such long-term trends may exist in the ground-based data. The annual cycle, altitude, and latitude effects clearly appear in the UV index data measured in South Africa. This variability must be taken into account for the development of an excess solar UV exposure prevention strategy.
二十多年来,南非一直在六个地点测量地面太阳紫外线指数,以提高人们对太阳紫外线指数对人类健康影响的认识。本文是一项基于与OMI/AURA实验的卫星紫外线指数测量结果进行比较的探索性研究。根据地点和年份的不同,地面测量数据与卫星反演数据之间的紫外线指数相对差异在0%至45%之间。大多数情况下,这些差异出现在冬季。一些地面站的数据与卫星反演数据的一致性更高。虽然地面仪器并非用于长期趋势分析,但它们提供了紫外线指数信息以提高公众意识,并且有一些微弱迹象表明地面数据中可能存在这种长期趋势。年周期、海拔和纬度效应在南非测量的紫外线指数数据中清晰可见。在制定预防过度太阳紫外线暴露的策略时,必须考虑到这种变异性。