Clark Duncan B, Chung Tammy, Martin Christopher S, Hasler Brant P, Fitzgerald Douglas H, Luna Beatriz, Brown Sandra A, Tapert Susan F, Brumback Ty, Cummins Kevin, Pfefferbaum Adolf, Sullivan Edith V, Pohl Kilian M, Colrain Ian M, Baker Fiona C, De Bellis Michael D, Nooner Kate B, Nagel Bonnie J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Nov 13;11:223. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00223. eCollection 2017.
During adolescence, problems reflecting cognitive, behavioral and affective dysregulation, such as inattention and emotional dyscontrol, have been observed to be associated with substance use disorder (SUD) risks and outcomes. Prior studies have typically been with small samples, and have typically not included comprehensive measurement of executive dysfunction domains. The relationships of executive dysfunction in daily life with performance based testing of cognitive skills and structural brain characteristics, thought to be the basis for executive functioning, have not been definitively determined. The aims of this study were to determine the relationships between executive dysfunction in daily life, measured by the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), cognitive skills and structural brain characteristics, and SUD risks, including a global SUD risk indicator, sleep quality, and risky alcohol and cannabis use. In addition to bivariate relationships, multivariate models were tested. The subjects ( = 817; ages 12 through 21) were participants in the National Consortium on Alcohol and Neurodevelopment in Adolescence (NCANDA) study. The results indicated that executive dysfunction was significantly related to SUD risks, poor sleep quality, risky alcohol use and cannabis use, and was not significantly related to cognitive skills or structural brain characteristics. In multivariate models, the relationship between poor sleep quality and risky substance use was mediated by executive dysfunction. While these cross-sectional relationships need to be further examined in longitudinal analyses, the results suggest that poor sleep quality and executive dysfunction may be viable preventive intervention targets to reduce adolescent substance use.
在青少年时期,已观察到反映认知、行为和情感失调的问题,如注意力不集中和情绪失控,与物质使用障碍(SUD)的风险及后果相关。先前的研究通常样本量较小,且通常未全面测量执行功能障碍领域。日常生活中的执行功能障碍与被认为是执行功能基础的基于表现的认知技能测试及脑结构特征之间的关系尚未明确确定。本研究的目的是确定通过执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF)测量的日常生活中的执行功能障碍、认知技能和脑结构特征与SUD风险之间的关系,包括整体SUD风险指标、睡眠质量以及危险的酒精和大麻使用。除了双变量关系外,还测试了多变量模型。研究对象(n = 817;年龄在12至21岁之间)是青少年酒精与神经发育全国联盟(NCANDA)研究的参与者。结果表明,执行功能障碍与SUD风险、睡眠质量差、危险的酒精使用和大麻使用显著相关,而与认知技能或脑结构特征无显著关系。在多变量模型中,睡眠质量差与危险物质使用之间的关系由执行功能障碍介导。虽然这些横断面关系需要在纵向分析中进一步研究,但结果表明,睡眠质量差和执行功能障碍可能是减少青少年物质使用的可行预防干预目标。