Gradmann Christoph
Section for Medical Anthropology and History, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2017 Nov 27;40(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s40656-017-0176-8.
Upon entering clinical medicine in the 1940s, antibiotic therapy seemed to complete a transformation of hospitals that originated in the late nineteenth century. Former death sinks had become harbingers of therapeutic progress. Yet this triumph was short-lived. The arrival of pathologies caused by resistant bacteria, and of nosocomial infections whose spread was helped by antibiotic therapies, seemed to be intimately related to modern anti-infective therapy. The place where such problems culminated were hospitals, which increasingly appeared as dangerous environments where attempts to combat infectious diseases had instead created hothouses of disease evolution. This paper will focus on one aspect of that history. It caused clinical medicine and hospital hygiene in particular to pay attention to a dimension of infectious disease it had previously paid little attention to thus far: The evolution of infectious disease-previously a matter of mostly theoretical interest-came to be useful in explaining many phenomena observed. This did not turn hospital hygienists into geneticists, though it did give them an awareness that the evolution of infectious disease in a broad sense was something that did matter to them. The paper advances its argument by looking at three phases: The growing awareness of the hospital as a dangerous environment in the 1950s, comprehensive attempts at improving antibiotic therapy and hospital hygiene that followed from the 1960s and lastly the framing of such challenges as risk factors from the 1970s. In conclusion, I will argue that hospital hygiene, being inspired in particular by epidemiology and risk factor analysis, discussed its own specific version of disease emergence and therefore contributed to the 1980s debates around such topics. Being loosely connected to more specialized studies, it consisted of a re-interpretation of infectious disease centred around the temporality of such phenomena as they were encountered in day-to-day dealings of clinical wards.
20世纪40年代进入临床医学领域时,抗生素疗法似乎完成了一场始于19世纪末的医院变革。昔日的死亡之地已成为治疗进展的先驱。然而,这一胜利是短暂的。由耐药细菌引起的疾病以及因抗生素疗法而助长传播的医院感染的出现,似乎与现代抗感染疗法密切相关。这些问题最为严重的地方是医院,医院越来越像是危险的环境,在抗击传染病的过程中反而造就了疾病进化的温床。本文将聚焦这段历史的一个方面。它尤其促使临床医学和医院卫生学关注传染病的一个此前几乎未被关注的维度:传染病的进化——此前大多只是理论上的兴趣点——开始有助于解释许多观察到的现象。这并没有让医院卫生学家变成遗传学家,但确实让他们意识到,广义上传染病的进化对他们来说是重要的事情。本文通过审视三个阶段来推进其论点:20世纪50年代对医院作为危险环境的认识不断增强,随后从60年代开始全面尝试改进抗生素疗法和医院卫生,最后是从70年代开始将此类挑战界定为风险因素。总之,我将论证,医院卫生学尤其受到流行病学和风险因素分析的启发,探讨了其自身关于疾病出现的特定版本,因此为20世纪80年代围绕此类话题的辩论做出了贡献。它与更专业的研究联系松散,由围绕临床病房日常工作中遇到的此类现象的时间性对传染病进行的重新诠释组成。