• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互补作用的获得

Acquisition of complementation.

作者信息

Bloom L, Rispoli M, Gartner B, Hafitz J

出版信息

J Child Lang. 1989 Feb;16(1):101-20. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900013465.

DOI:10.1017/s0305000900013465
PMID:2925807
Abstract

This study concerns the acquisition of complex sentences with perception and epistemic verbs that take a second verb in their complements. The acquisition of complementation began between two and three years of age in this longitudinal study of four children's spontaneous speech. The results of the study showed that (1) complement types and complementizer connectives and (2) the discourse contexts in which complementation occurred were specific to individual matrix verbs. The most frequent verbs acquired were the perception verbs see and look and the epistemic verbs think and know. Developments in both discourse and syntax indicated that these verbs expressed attitudes of certainty/uncertainty toward the content expressed in their complements. The results are discussed in terms of both linguistic and psychological factors in the acquisition of complex sentences with complementation.

摘要

本研究关注的是带有感知动词和认知动词的复合句的习得情况,这些动词在其补语中带有第二个动词。在这项对四个孩子自发言语的纵向研究中,补语结构的习得始于两到三岁。研究结果表明:(1)补语类型和补语连接词,以及(2)出现补语结构的语篇语境,都特定于各个主句动词。习得频率最高的动词是感知动词“see”(看见)和“look”(看),以及认知动词“think”(认为)和“know”(知道)。语篇和句法方面的发展都表明,这些动词表达了对其补语中所表达内容的确定/不确定态度。本文从带有补语结构的复合句习得过程中的语言和心理因素两方面对研究结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Acquisition of complementation.互补作用的获得
J Child Lang. 1989 Feb;16(1):101-20. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900013465.
2
Mistakes weren't made: Three-year-olds' comprehension of novel-verb passives provides evidence for early abstract syntax.错误并非偶然:三岁儿童对新奇动词被动句的理解为早期抽象句法提供了证据。
Cognition. 2018 Sep;178:118-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 28.
3
Sources of meaning in the acquisition of complex syntax: the sample case of causality.复杂句法习得中的意义来源:因果关系的示例
J Exp Child Psychol. 1987 Feb;43(1):112-28. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(87)90054-3.
4
Theoretical implications of complement structure acquisition in Korean.韩语中补语结构习得的理论意义。
J Child Lang. 1989 Oct;16(3):573-98. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900010734.
5
Relations between mental verb and false belief understanding in Cantonese-speaking children.粤语儿童心理动词与错误信念理解之间的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Oct;104(2):141-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
6
Vision Verbs Emerge First in English Acquisition but Touch, not Audition, Follows Second.视觉动词先于英语习得出现,而触觉而非听觉随后出现。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Jun;48(6):e13469. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13469.
7
Acquisition of mental state language in Spanish children: a longitudinal study of the relationship between the production of mental verbs and linguistic development.西班牙儿童心理状态语言的习得:一项关于心理动词产出与语言发展关系的纵向研究。
Dev Sci. 2008 Jul;11(4):454-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00691.x.
8
Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax.语义普遍性、输入频率与句法习得
J Child Lang. 2004 Feb;31(1):61-99.
9
Reading comprehension: think and know verbs.阅读理解:思考和认知动词。
Psychol Rep. 2003 Dec;93(3 Pt 2):1247-60. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3f.1247.
10
How does a blind person see? Developmental change in applying visual verbs to agents with disabilities.盲人如何看?将视觉动词应用于残疾代理人的发展变化。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104683. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104683. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The Understanding of Complex Syntax in Children From 5 to 9 Years, Using a Novel Assessment Approach - The Test of Complex Syntax- Electronic (TECS-E).采用一种新颖的评估方法——复杂句法电子测试(TECS-E)对5至9岁儿童复杂句法的理解
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70079. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70079.
2
Young children's understanding of the epistemic and deontic meanings of ask and tell.儿童对询问和告知的认识,包括认识其认识论和道义论的意义。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Dec;224:105516. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105516. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
3
Training Syntax to Enhance Theory of Mind in Children with ASD.
训练语法以增强自闭症儿童的心理理论。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Jun;53(6):2444-2457. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05507-0. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
4
Parental Reports of Preschoolers' Lexical and Syntactic Development: Validation of the CDI-III for European Portuguese.学龄前儿童词汇和句法发展的家长报告:欧洲葡萄牙语版CDI-III的验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:677575. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677575. eCollection 2021.
5
Acquisition and Development of Verb/Predicate Chaining in Hebrew.希伯来语中动词/谓语链的习得与发展
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 22;10:2958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02958. eCollection 2019.
6
The Impact of Grammar on Mentalizing: A Training Study Including Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Language Disorder.语法对心理理论的影响:一项针对自闭症谱系障碍和发育性语言障碍儿童的训练研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 19;10:2478. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02478. eCollection 2019.
7
The Age Factor Revisited: Timing in Acquisition Interacts With Age of Onset in Bilingual Acquisition.重新审视年龄因素:双语习得中的习得时间与起始年龄相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 14;9:2732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02732. eCollection 2018.
8
Can Infinitival to Omissions and Provisions Be Primed? An Experimental Investigation Into the Role of Constructional Competition in Infinitival to Omission Errors.“to”省略和相关规则能否被启动?关于“to”省略错误中结构竞争作用的实验研究。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;41(5):1242-1273. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12407. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
9
The Relationship between Syntactic Development and Theory of Mind: Evidence from a Small-Population Study of a Developmental Language Disorder.句法发展与心理理论之间的关系:来自一项针对发育性语言障碍小群体研究的证据。
J Neurolinguistics. 2011 Jul 1;24(4):476-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.03.001.
10
English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses: evidence for general-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 Nov;31(6):599-617. doi: 10.1023/a:1021265021141.