• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Age Factor Revisited: Timing in Acquisition Interacts With Age of Onset in Bilingual Acquisition.重新审视年龄因素:双语习得中的习得时间与起始年龄相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 14;9:2732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02732. eCollection 2018.
2
The role of age and timing in bilingual assessment: non-word repetition, subject-verb agreement and case marking in L1 and eL2 children with and without SLI.年龄和时机在双语评估中的作用:有和没有特定语言障碍的第一语言和第二语言儿童的非词重复、主谓一致和格标记
Clin Linguist Phon. 2022 Jan 2;36(1):54-74. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2021.1885497. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
"Which mouse kissed the frog?" Effects of age of onset, length of exposure, and knowledge of case marking on the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children.“哪只老鼠吻了青蛙?”发病年龄、接触时长以及格标记知识对德语同声传译和早期连续双语儿童理解特殊疑问句的影响。
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):635-61. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000015. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
4
German dative case marking in monolingual and simultaneous bilingual children with and without SLI.有和没有特定语言障碍的单语及同时双语儿童的德语与格标记
J Commun Disord. 2018 Sep-Oct;75:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Influence of current input-output and age of first exposure on phonological acquisition in early bilingual Spanish-English-speaking kindergarteners.当前输入输出及首次接触年龄对早期说西班牙语和英语的双语幼儿园儿童语音习得的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jul;51(4):368-83. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12214. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
6
Prerequisites of Third-Person Pronoun Use in Monolingual and Bilingual Children With Autism and Typical Language Development.自闭症及语言发育正常的单语和双语儿童使用第三人称代词的前提条件
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 15;10:2289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02289. eCollection 2019.
7
The joint effects of bilingualism, DLD and item frequency on children's lexical-retrieval performance.双语、语言发育迟缓及项目频率对儿童词汇提取表现的联合影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):485-498. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12454. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
8
How much exposure to English is necessary for a bilingual toddler to perform like a monolingual peer in language tests?对于一个双语学步儿童来说,要在语言测试中表现得像单语同龄人一样,需要接触多少英语?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):649-71. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12082. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
9
Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.模拟听力损失对双语儿童噪声中辅音识别的影响。
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):e292-e304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000428.
10
Do eye movements reveal differences between monolingual and bilingual children's first-language and second-language reading? A focus on word frequency effects.眼球运动能否揭示单语和双语儿童第一语言和第二语言阅读之间的差异?对词频效应的关注。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:318-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Bilingual disadvantages are systematically compensated by bilingual advantages across tasks and populations.双语劣势在不同任务和人群中会被双语优势系统性地抵消。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):2107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52417-5.
2
Deconstructing the Native Speaker: Further Evidence From Heritage Speakers for Why This Horse Should Be Dead!解构母语者:来自母语传承者的进一步证据,证明这匹马为何应该被淘汰!
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 5;12:717352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717352. eCollection 2021.
3
The Bilingual Native Speaker Competence: Evidence From Explicit and Implicit Language Knowledge Using Elicited Production, Sentence-Picture Matching, and Pupillometry.双语母语者能力:来自显性和隐性语言知识的证据,运用诱发产出法、句子-图片匹配法和瞳孔测量法
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 16;12:717379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717379. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilingual children's long-term outcomes in English as a second language: language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals.双语儿童将英语作为第二语言的长期发展结果:语言环境因素塑造了在追赶单语儿童方面的个体差异。
Dev Sci. 2017 Jan;20(1). doi: 10.1111/desc.12433. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
2
"Which mouse kissed the frog?" Effects of age of onset, length of exposure, and knowledge of case marking on the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children.“哪只老鼠吻了青蛙?”发病年龄、接触时长以及格标记知识对德语同声传译和早期连续双语儿童理解特殊疑问句的影响。
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):635-61. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000015. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
Early child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or both?幼儿第二语言习得:年龄效应还是输入效应?都不是,还是两者皆有?
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):608-34. doi: 10.1017/S030500091500080X. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
4
Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives.儿童第二语言习得中较晚的起始年龄可能具有促进作用:来自西班牙母语者习得英语被动语态的证据。
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):662-86. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000549. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
5
Exposure to English Before and After Entry into Head Start: Bilingual Children's Receptive Language Growth in Spanish and English.进入“提前开端计划”前后接触英语:双语儿童西班牙语和英语接受性语言的发展
Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2008;11(1):30-56. doi: 10.2167/beb376.0. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
6
What You Hear and What You Say: Language Performance in Spanish English Bilinguals.你所听到的与你所说的:西班牙语-英语双语者的语言表现
Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2010;13(3):325-344. doi: 10.1080/13670050903342019.
7
Dual language exposure and early bilingual development.双语环境与早期双语发展。
J Child Lang. 2012 Jan;39(1):1-27. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000759. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
8
Bilingual children's acquisition of the past tense: a usage-based approach.双语儿童对过去时态的习得:一种基于用法的方法。
J Child Lang. 2011 Jun;38(3):554-78. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000218. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
9
A theory of neurolinguistic development.一种神经语言学发展理论。
Brain Lang. 1997 Jun 15;58(2):265-326. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1791.
10
Acquisition of complementation.互补作用的获得
J Child Lang. 1989 Feb;16(1):101-20. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900013465.

重新审视年龄因素:双语习得中的习得时间与起始年龄相互作用。

The Age Factor Revisited: Timing in Acquisition Interacts With Age of Onset in Bilingual Acquisition.

作者信息

Schulz Petra, Grimm Angela

机构信息

Institute for Psycholinguistics and Didactics of German, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 14;9:2732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02732. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02732
PMID:30692953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6339886/
Abstract

In this paper, we investigate whether timing in monolingual acquisition interacts with age of onset and input effects in child bilingualism. Six different morpho-syntactic and semantic phenomena acquired early, late or very late are considered, with their timing in L1 acquisition varying between age 3 (subject-verb agreement) and after age 6 (case marking). Data from simultaneous bilingual children (2L1) whose mean age of onset to German was 3 months are compared with data from early second language learners of German (eL2) whose mean age of onset to German was 35 months as well as with data from monolingual children. To explore change over time, children were tested twice at the ages of 4;4 and 5;8 years. The main findings were that 2L1 children had an advantage over their eL2 peers in early acquired phenomena, which disappeared with time, whereas in late acquired phenomena 2L1 and eL2 children did not differ. Moreover, 2L1 children performed like monolingual children in early acquired phenomena but had a disadvantage in the late acquired phenomena with the amount of delay decreasing with time. We conclude that age of onset effects are modulated by effects of timing in monolingual acquisition. Contrary to expectation, input in terms of language dominance, measured as the dominant language used at home, did not affect simultaneous bilingual children's performance in any of the phenomena. We discuss the implications of our findings for the hypothesis that acquisition of late phenomena is determined by input alone and suggest an alternative concept: the learner's internal need for time to master a phenomenon, which is determined by its complexity and cross-linguistic robustness.

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了单语习得中的时机是否与儿童双语习得中的起始年龄和输入效应相互作用。我们考虑了六种在早期、晚期或非常晚期习得的不同形态句法和语义现象,它们在第一语言习得中的时机在3岁(主谓一致)到6岁以后(格标记)之间变化。将平均开始学习德语年龄为3个月的同时双语儿童(2L1)的数据与平均开始学习德语年龄为35个月的早期第二语言学习者(eL2)的数据以及单语儿童的数据进行了比较。为了探究随时间的变化,在4岁4个月和5岁8个月时对儿童进行了两次测试。主要发现是,2L1儿童在早期习得的现象上比他们的eL2同龄人有优势,这种优势随着时间消失,而在晚期习得的现象上2L1和eL2儿童没有差异。此外,2L1儿童在早期习得的现象上表现得与单语儿童相似,但在晚期习得的现象上处于劣势,延迟程度随着时间减少。我们得出结论,起始年龄效应受到单语习得中时机效应的调节。与预期相反,以在家中使用的主导语言衡量的语言优势方面的输入,在任何现象中都没有影响同时双语儿童的表现。我们讨论了我们的发现对晚期现象习得仅由输入决定这一假设的影响,并提出了一个替代概念:学习者掌握一种现象所需的内部时间需求,这由其复杂性和跨语言稳健性决定。