Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Lung Cancer. 2018 Jan;115:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
The seminal phase II trial for pulmonary stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) suggested that SBRT to central lesions resulted in unacceptable toxicity. Alternative dose-fractionation schemes have been proposed which may improve safety without compromise of efficacy. We report our institutional outcomes of SBRT for hilar/mediastinal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
A retrospective review was conducted of patients with NSCLC in a hilar or mediastinal nodal station which was treated with SBRT. Patients presented with a lesion involving the hilum or mediastinum from primary or oligorecurrent NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank testing and Cox analysis were utilized for outcomes analysis.
From 2008-2015, 40 patients with median age of 70 were treated with SBRT for primary/oligorecurrent hilar/mediastinal NSCLC with median follow-up of 16.4 months. 85% presented with oligorecurrent disease at a median of 22.4 months following definitive therapy. The aortico-pulmonary window was the target in 40%, the hilum in 25%, lower paratracheal in 20%, subcarinal in 10%, and prevascular in 5%. The median dose was 48Gy in 4 fractions (range: 35-48Gy in 4-5 fractions). Median overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survivals were 22.7 and 13.1 months, respectively. Two-year local control was 87.7% and not significantly different between hilar and mediastinal targets. Median PFS was significantly improved in patients with hilar vs mediastinal nodal targets: 33.3 vs 8.4 months, respectively (p=0.031). OS was not statistically different between hilar and mediastinal targets (p=0.359). On multivariable analysis, hilar vs mediastinal target predicted for PFS (HR 3.045 95%CI [1.044-8.833], p=0.042), as did shorter time to presentation in patients with oligorecurrence (HR 0.983 [95%CI 0.967-1.000], p=0.049). Acute grade 3+ morbidity was seen in 3 patients (hemoptysis, pericardial/pleural effusion, heart failure) and late grade 3+ morbidity (hemoptysis) in 1 patient.
Hilar/mediastinal SBRT appears to be a safe technique for the local control of isolated nodal disease with limited toxicity from the fractionation schemes utilized.
肺部立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)的开创性 II 期试验表明,中央病变的 SBRT 导致无法接受的毒性。已经提出了替代剂量分割方案,这些方案可能在不影响疗效的情况下提高安全性。我们报告了我们机构对肺门/纵隔非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)进行 SBRT 的结果。
对接受 SBRT 治疗的肺门/纵隔淋巴结区 NSCLC 患者进行回顾性分析。患者表现为原发性或寡复发 NSCLC 累及肺门或纵隔的病变。采用 Kaplan-Meier 对数秩检验和 Cox 分析进行生存分析。
2008 年至 2015 年,40 例中位年龄为 70 岁的患者因原发性/寡复发肺门/纵隔 NSCLC 接受 SBRT 治疗,中位随访时间为 16.4 个月。85%的患者在根治性治疗后中位时间为 22.4 个月出现寡复发疾病。主动脉肺动脉窗为靶区 40%,肺门 25%,下气管旁 20%,隆突下 10%,血管前 5%。中位剂量为 48Gy 分 4 次(范围:35-48Gy 分 4-5 次)。中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 22.7 和 13.1 个月。2 年局部控制率为 87.7%,肺门和纵隔靶区之间无显著差异。肺门组的中位 PFS 明显优于纵隔组:分别为 33.3 和 8.4 个月(p=0.031)。肺门和纵隔靶区之间的 OS 无统计学差异(p=0.359)。多变量分析显示,肺门 vs 纵隔靶区预测 PFS(HR 3.045 95%CI [1.044-8.833],p=0.042),寡复发患者的就诊时间越短(HR 0.983 [95%CI 0.967-1.000],p=0.049)。3 例患者出现急性 3+级以上并发症(咯血、心包/胸腔积液、心力衰竭),1 例患者出现晚期 3+级以上并发症(咯血)。
对于利用所采用的分割方案治疗局限性淋巴结疾病的局部控制,肺门/纵隔 SBRT 似乎是一种安全的技术,毒性有限。