Suppr超能文献

立体定向体部放疗治疗孤立性肺门和纵隔区非小细胞肺癌。

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated hilar and mediastinal non-small cell lung cancers.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2018 Jan;115:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The seminal phase II trial for pulmonary stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) suggested that SBRT to central lesions resulted in unacceptable toxicity. Alternative dose-fractionation schemes have been proposed which may improve safety without compromise of efficacy. We report our institutional outcomes of SBRT for hilar/mediastinal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients with NSCLC in a hilar or mediastinal nodal station which was treated with SBRT. Patients presented with a lesion involving the hilum or mediastinum from primary or oligorecurrent NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank testing and Cox analysis were utilized for outcomes analysis.

RESULTS

From 2008-2015, 40 patients with median age of 70 were treated with SBRT for primary/oligorecurrent hilar/mediastinal NSCLC with median follow-up of 16.4 months. 85% presented with oligorecurrent disease at a median of 22.4 months following definitive therapy. The aortico-pulmonary window was the target in 40%, the hilum in 25%, lower paratracheal in 20%, subcarinal in 10%, and prevascular in 5%. The median dose was 48Gy in 4 fractions (range: 35-48Gy in 4-5 fractions). Median overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survivals were 22.7 and 13.1 months, respectively. Two-year local control was 87.7% and not significantly different between hilar and mediastinal targets. Median PFS was significantly improved in patients with hilar vs mediastinal nodal targets: 33.3 vs 8.4 months, respectively (p=0.031). OS was not statistically different between hilar and mediastinal targets (p=0.359). On multivariable analysis, hilar vs mediastinal target predicted for PFS (HR 3.045 95%CI [1.044-8.833], p=0.042), as did shorter time to presentation in patients with oligorecurrence (HR 0.983 [95%CI 0.967-1.000], p=0.049). Acute grade 3+ morbidity was seen in 3 patients (hemoptysis, pericardial/pleural effusion, heart failure) and late grade 3+ morbidity (hemoptysis) in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

Hilar/mediastinal SBRT appears to be a safe technique for the local control of isolated nodal disease with limited toxicity from the fractionation schemes utilized.

摘要

目的

肺部立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)的开创性 II 期试验表明,中央病变的 SBRT 导致无法接受的毒性。已经提出了替代剂量分割方案,这些方案可能在不影响疗效的情况下提高安全性。我们报告了我们机构对肺门/纵隔非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)进行 SBRT 的结果。

材料和方法

对接受 SBRT 治疗的肺门/纵隔淋巴结区 NSCLC 患者进行回顾性分析。患者表现为原发性或寡复发 NSCLC 累及肺门或纵隔的病变。采用 Kaplan-Meier 对数秩检验和 Cox 分析进行生存分析。

结果

2008 年至 2015 年,40 例中位年龄为 70 岁的患者因原发性/寡复发肺门/纵隔 NSCLC 接受 SBRT 治疗,中位随访时间为 16.4 个月。85%的患者在根治性治疗后中位时间为 22.4 个月出现寡复发疾病。主动脉肺动脉窗为靶区 40%,肺门 25%,下气管旁 20%,隆突下 10%,血管前 5%。中位剂量为 48Gy 分 4 次(范围:35-48Gy 分 4-5 次)。中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 22.7 和 13.1 个月。2 年局部控制率为 87.7%,肺门和纵隔靶区之间无显著差异。肺门组的中位 PFS 明显优于纵隔组:分别为 33.3 和 8.4 个月(p=0.031)。肺门和纵隔靶区之间的 OS 无统计学差异(p=0.359)。多变量分析显示,肺门 vs 纵隔靶区预测 PFS(HR 3.045 95%CI [1.044-8.833],p=0.042),寡复发患者的就诊时间越短(HR 0.983 [95%CI 0.967-1.000],p=0.049)。3 例患者出现急性 3+级以上并发症(咯血、心包/胸腔积液、心力衰竭),1 例患者出现晚期 3+级以上并发症(咯血)。

结论

对于利用所采用的分割方案治疗局限性淋巴结疾病的局部控制,肺门/纵隔 SBRT 似乎是一种安全的技术,毒性有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验