Forensic Department and Research Centre Brøset, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Faculty of medicine and health sciences, Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02582-4.
Violence in close relationships is a global public health problem and there is a need to implement therapeutic programs designed to help individuals who voluntarily seek help to reduce recurrent intimate partner violence. The effectiveness of such interventions in this population remains inconclusive. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural group therapy (CBGT) vs mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) group therapy in reducing violent behavior amongst individuals who are violent in intimate partnerships and who voluntarily seek help.
One hundred forty four participants were randomized using an internet-based computer system. Nineteen withdrew after randomization and 125 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention condition (CBGT, n = 67) or the comparator condition (MBSR, n = 58). The intervention condition involved two individual sessions followed by 15 cognitive-behavioural group therapy sessions. The comparator condition included one individual session before and after 8 mindfulness-based group sessions. Participants (N = 125) and their relationship partners (n = 56) completed assessments at baseline, and at three, six, nine and twelve months' follow-up. The pre-defined primary outcome was reported physical, psychological or sexual violence and physical injury as measured by the revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2).
The intent-to-treat analyses were based on 125 male participants (intervention group n = 67; comparator group n = 58). Fifty-six female partners provided collateral information. Baseline risk estimate in the CBGT-group was .85 (.74-.92), and .88 (.76-.94) in the MBSR-group for physical violence. At 12-months' follow-up a substantial reduction was found in both groups (CBGT: .08 (.03-.18); MBSR: .19 (.11-.32)).
Results provide support for the efficacy of both the cognitive-behavioural group therapy and the mindfulness-based stress reduction group therapy in reducing intimate partner violent behavior in men voluntarily seeking treatment.
NCT01653860, registered July 2012.
亲密关系中的暴力是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,因此需要实施治疗方案,以帮助那些自愿寻求帮助以减少反复出现的亲密伴侣暴力行为的个人。这些干预措施在这一人群中的效果仍不确定。本研究的目的是比较认知行为团体治疗(CBGT)与基于正念减压(MBSR)团体治疗对减少自愿寻求帮助的亲密伴侣暴力个体的暴力行为的效果。
使用基于互联网的计算机系统对 144 名参与者进行随机分组。19 名参与者在随机分组后退出,125 名参与者被随机分配到干预组(CBGT,n=67)或对照组(MBSR,n=58)。干预组包括两次个体治疗和 15 次认知行为团体治疗。对照组包括 8 次正念团体治疗前后的一次个体治疗。参与者(N=125)及其伴侣(n=56)在基线、3、6、9 和 12 个月随访时完成评估。预先确定的主要结局是修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2)测量的报告的身体、心理或性暴力和身体伤害。
意向治疗分析基于 125 名男性参与者(干预组 n=67;对照组 n=58)。56 名女性伴侣提供了间接信息。CBGT 组的基线风险估计为 0.85(0.74-0.92),MBSR 组为 0.88(0.76-0.94)。在 12 个月的随访中,两组都有明显的减少(CBGT:0.08(0.03-0.18);MBSR:0.19(0.11-0.32))。
结果为认知行为团体治疗和基于正念减压的团体治疗在减少自愿寻求治疗的男性亲密伴侣暴力行为方面的疗效提供了支持。
NCT01653860,2012 年 7 月注册。