Suppr超能文献

通过问卷调查和佩戴在手腕上的加速度计得出的身体活动情况:基于人群的老年人样本中两者的可比性以及人口统计学、生活方式和健康因素的作用

Physical activity derived from questionnaires and wrist-worn accelerometers: comparability and the role of demographic, lifestyle, and health factors among a population-based sample of older adults.

作者信息

Koolhaas Chantal M, van Rooij Frank Ja, Cepeda Magda, Tiemeier Henning, Franco Oscar H, Schoufour Josje D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 18;10:1-16. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S147613. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Agreement between questionnaires and accelerometers to measure physical activity (PA) differs between studies and might be related to demographic, lifestyle, and health characteristics, including disability and depressive symptoms.

METHODS

We included 1,410 individuals aged 51-94 years from the population-based Rotterdam Study. Participants completed the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire and wore a wrist-worn accelerometer on the nondominant wrist for 1 week thereafter. We compared the Spearman correlation and disagreement (level and direction) for total PA across levels of demographic, lifestyle, and health variables. The level of disagreement was defined as the absolute difference between questionnaire- and accelerometer-derived PA, whereas the direction of disagreement was defined as questionnaire PA minus accelerometer PA. We used linear regression analyses with the level and direction of disagreement as outcome, including all demographic, lifestyle, and health variables in the model.

RESULTS

We observed a Spearman correlation of 0.30 between questionnaire- and accelerometer-derived PA in the total population. The level of disagreement (ie, absolute difference) was 941.9 (standard deviation [SD] 747.0) minutes/week, and the PA reported by questionnaire was on average 529.4 (SD 1,079.5) minutes/week lower than PA obtained by the accelerometer. The level of disagreement decreased with higher educational levels. Additionally, participants with obesity, higher disability scores, and more depressive symptoms underestimated their self-reported PA more than their healthier counterparts.

CONCLUSION

We observed large differences in PA time derived from the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire and the wrist-worn accelerometer. Differences between the methods were related to body-mass index, level of disability, and presence of depressive symptoms. Future studies using questionnaires and/or accelerometers should account for these differences.

摘要

背景

不同研究中,问卷与加速度计测量身体活动(PA)的一致性存在差异,这可能与人口统计学、生活方式和健康特征有关,包括残疾和抑郁症状。

方法

我们纳入了基于人群的鹿特丹研究中1410名年龄在51 - 94岁之间的个体。参与者完成了LASA身体活动问卷,之后在非优势手腕上佩戴腕式加速度计1周。我们比较了人口统计学、生活方式和健康变量各水平下总PA的斯皮尔曼相关性和不一致性(水平和方向)。不一致性水平定义为问卷法和加速度计法得出的PA之间的绝对差值,而不一致性方向定义为问卷PA减去加速度计PA。我们使用线性回归分析,将不一致性水平和方向作为结果,模型中纳入所有人口统计学、生活方式和健康变量。

结果

在总人群中,问卷法和加速度计法得出的PA之间斯皮尔曼相关性为0.30。不一致性水平(即绝对差值)为941.9(标准差[SD] 747.0)分钟/周,问卷报告的PA平均比加速度计测得的PA低529.4(SD 1079.5)分钟/周。不一致性水平随教育程度提高而降低。此外,肥胖、残疾得分较高和抑郁症状较多的参与者比健康状况较好的参与者更低估其自我报告的PA。

结论

我们观察到LASA身体活动问卷和腕式加速度计得出的PA时间存在很大差异。方法之间的差异与体重指数、残疾水平和抑郁症状的存在有关。未来使用问卷和/或加速度计的研究应考虑这些差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/098b/5739112/9274abd892ab/clep-10-001Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验