1 Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Feb;28(3):339-345. doi: 10.1177/1049732317750127.
Although theory building is often described as the ultimate goal of qualitative research, an examination of articles in Qualitative Health Research ( QHR) shows that themes are actually the typical format for reporting results. In addition, articles that rely on themes often present low-level theories in the form of models that connect these themes. Because models have received less attention than either themes or theories, this article concentrates on summarizing four different kinds of models: hierarchies, timelines, processes, and cycles. In each of these cases, it presents both a general illustration of such a model and a realistic example from a published article in QHR. It concludes with a call for greater recognition of the role that models play in capturing the results of qualitative research.
虽然理论构建通常被描述为定性研究的最终目标,但对《定性健康研究》(QHR)中的文章进行的考察表明,主题实际上是报告研究结果的典型格式。此外,依赖主题的文章通常以连接这些主题的模型形式呈现低层次的理论。由于模型受到的关注比主题和理论都少,因此本文重点总结了四种不同类型的模型:层次结构、时间线、过程和循环。在每种情况下,本文都提供了此类模型的一般说明和 QHR 中发表的文章中的实际示例。最后呼吁人们更加认识到模型在捕捉定性研究结果方面所起的作用。