Suppr超能文献

临床微生物学实验室中手工划线与自动划线系统:Previ Isola对血培养和体液样本的性能评估

Manual versus automated streaking system in clinical microbiology laboratory: Performance evaluation of Previ Isola for blood culture and body fluid samples.

作者信息

Choi Qute, Kim Hyun Jin, Kim Jong Wan, Kwon Gye Cheol, Koo Sun Hoe

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Jun;32(5):e22373. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22373. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The process of plate streaking has been automated to improve routine workflow of clinical microbiology laboratories. Although there were many evaluation reports about the inoculation of various body fluid samples, few evaluations have been reported for blood. In this study, we evaluated the performance of automated inoculating system, Previ Isola for various routine clinical samples including blood.

METHODS

Blood culture, body fluid, and urine samples were collected. All samples were inoculated on both sheep blood agar plate (BAP) and MacConkey agar plate (MCK) using Previ Isola and manual method. We compared two methods in aspect of quality and quantity of cultures, and sample processing time. To ensure objective colony counting, an enumeration reading reference was made through a preliminary experiment.

RESULTS

A total of 377 nonduplicate samples (102 blood culture, 203 urine, 72 body fluid) were collected and inoculated. The concordance rate of quality was 100%, 97.0%, and 98.6% in blood, urine, and other body fluids, respectively. In quantitative aspect, it was 98.0%, 97.0%, and 95.8%, respectively. The Previ Isola took a little longer to inoculate the specimen than manual method, but the hands-on time decreased dramatically. The shortened hands-on time using Previ Isola was about 6 minutes per 10 samples.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the Previ Isola showed high concordance with the manual method in the inoculation of various body fluids, especially in blood culture sample. The use of Previ Isola in clinical microbiology laboratories is expected to save considerable time and human resources.

摘要

背景

平板划线过程已实现自动化,以改善临床微生物实验室的常规工作流程。尽管已有许多关于各种体液样本接种的评估报告,但针对血液样本的评估却鲜有报道。在本研究中,我们评估了自动化接种系统Previ Isola对包括血液在内的各种常规临床样本的性能。

方法

收集血培养、体液和尿液样本。所有样本均使用Previ Isola和手工方法接种于羊血琼脂平板(BAP)和麦康凯琼脂平板(MCK)上。我们在培养物的质量和数量以及样本处理时间方面比较了这两种方法。为确保客观的菌落计数,通过初步实验制作了一份计数读数参考。

结果

共收集并接种了377份非重复样本(102份血培养样本、203份尿液样本、72份体液样本)。血液、尿液和其他体液样本的质量一致性率分别为100%、97.0%和98.6%。在定量方面,分别为98.0%、97.0%和95.8%。Previ Isola接种标本的时间比手工方法稍长,但实际操作时间大幅减少。使用Previ Isola缩短的实际操作时间约为每10个样本6分钟。

结论

我们证明,Previ Isola在各种体液接种中,尤其是在血培养样本接种中,与手工方法具有高度一致性。预计在临床微生物实验室中使用Previ Isola可节省大量时间和人力资源。

相似文献

9
Performance of Copan WASP for Routine Urine Microbiology.科盼WASP用于常规尿液微生物学检测的性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):585-92. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02577-15. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

4
Automation in the Life Science Research Laboratory.生命科学研究实验室中的自动化
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Nov 13;8:571777. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.571777. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

4
Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose?临床细菌学中的实验室自动化:应选择哪种系统?
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Mar;22(3):217-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09.030. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
10
Automation in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学中的自动化。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1658-65. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00301-13. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验