Suppr超能文献

内镜下硬化疗法与食管静脉曲张出血的保守治疗对比。一项关于急诊和长期治疗的5年前瞻性对照试验。

Endoscopic sclerotherapy v. conservative management of bleeding oesophageal varices. A 5-year prospective controlled trial of emergency and long-term treatment.

作者信息

Söderlund C, Ihre T

出版信息

Acta Chir Scand. 1985;151(5):449-56.

PMID:2931937
Abstract

A comparative trial was made of conservative therapy (balloon tamponade and/or vasopression infusion) alone (control group) or with addition of acute and serial endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (ST group). The 107 unselected patients, mainly with alcoholic cirrhosis, were randomly allocated to these groups, which were comparable as regards Child's grading and clinical and laboratory findings. For emergency ST a fibreoptic endoscope and Williams sheath were used. In initial control of index bleed and hospital mortality the two groups did not differ significantly. The median follow-up was 15 and 28 months (minimum 1 year). Supplementary ST (mainly out-patient) gave variceal eradication in 34 of 41 patients, with most failures in persistent alcoholics. A calculated risk factor for rebleeds was 3.6 times higher in the controls than in the ST group. Mortality rate showed no intergroup difference. The cause of death mainly was variceal bleeding in the controls, but not in the ST group. Major complications of treatment occurred in c. 15% of all patients.

摘要

对单纯采用保守治疗(气囊填塞和/或加压素输注)(对照组)或联合急性和系列内镜注射硬化疗法(ST组)进行了一项对比试验。107例未经筛选的患者主要患有酒精性肝硬化,被随机分配到这些组中,两组在Child分级以及临床和实验室检查结果方面具有可比性。对于急诊ST,使用了纤维内镜和Williams鞘。在控制初次出血和医院死亡率方面,两组无显著差异。中位随访时间分别为15个月和28个月(最短1年)。补充性ST(主要为门诊治疗)使41例患者中的34例静脉曲张消除,大多数治疗失败发生在持续酗酒者中。对照组再出血的计算风险因素比ST组高3.6倍。死亡率在组间无差异。对照组的主要死因主要是静脉曲张出血,而ST组并非如此。约15%的所有患者发生了主要治疗并发症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验