Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Institutes GROW and CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and the Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Apr;26(4):450-470. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0077-z. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Technological developments in gene editing raise high expectations for clinical applications, including editing of the germline. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) together developed a Background document and Recommendations to inform and stimulate ongoing societal debates. This document provides the background to the Recommendations. Germline gene editing is currently not allowed in many countries. This makes clinical applications in these countries impossible now, even if germline gene editing would become safe and effective. What were the arguments behind this legislation, and are they still convincing? If a technique could help to avoid serious genetic disorders, in a safe and effective way, would this be a reason to reconsider earlier standpoints? This Background document summarizes the scientific developments and expectations regarding germline gene editing, legal regulations at the European level, and ethics for three different settings (basic research, preclinical research and clinical applications). In ethical terms, we argue that the deontological objections (e.g., gene editing goes against nature) do not seem convincing while consequentialist objections (e.g., safety for the children thus conceived and following generations) require research, not all of which is allowed in the current legal situation in European countries. Development of this Background document and Recommendations reflects the responsibility to help society understand and debate the full range of possible implications of the new technologies, and to contribute to regulations that are adapted to the dynamics of the field while taking account of ethical considerations and societal concerns.
基因编辑技术的发展带来了对临床应用的高度期望,包括对生殖系的编辑。欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会(ESHRE)和欧洲人类遗传学学会(ESHG)共同制定了一份背景文件和建议,以告知和激发正在进行的社会辩论。本文档提供了建议的背景。目前,许多国家都不允许进行生殖系基因编辑。因此,即使生殖系基因编辑变得安全有效,目前这些国家也不可能进行临床应用。这些立法背后的论点是什么,它们仍然有说服力吗?如果一种技术可以安全有效地帮助避免严重的遗传疾病,这是否是重新考虑早期立场的一个理由?本背景文件总结了生殖系基因编辑的科学发展和预期、欧洲层面的法律规定以及三种不同情境(基础研究、临床前研究和临床应用)的伦理学。从伦理角度来看,我们认为,义务论的反对意见(例如,基因编辑违背自然)似乎没有说服力,而后果主义的反对意见(例如,为这样构想的孩子和后代的安全)需要研究,而在当前欧洲国家的法律情况下,并非所有研究都被允许。本背景文件和建议的制定反映了帮助社会理解和辩论新技术的所有可能影响,并为适应该领域动态的法规做出贡献的责任,同时考虑到伦理考虑和社会关注。