• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全球范围内检测互惠性。

Detecting reciprocity at a global scale.

作者信息

Frank Morgan R, Obradovich Nick, Sun Lijun, Woon Wei Lee, LeVeck Brad L, Rahwan Iyad

机构信息

Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2018 Jan 3;4(1):eaao5348. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5348. eCollection 2018 Jan.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aao5348
PMID:29326983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5756659/
Abstract

Reciprocity stabilizes cooperation from the level of microbes all the way up to humans interacting in small groups, but does reciprocity also underlie stable cooperation between larger human agglomerations, such as nation states? Famously, evolutionary models show that reciprocity could emerge as a widespread strategy for achieving international cooperation. However, existing studies have only detected reciprocity-driven cooperation in a small number of country pairs. We apply a new method for detecting mutual influence in dynamical systems to a new large-scale data set that records state interactions with high temporal resolution. Doing so, we detect reciprocity between many country pairs in the international system and find that these reciprocating country pairs exhibit qualitatively different cooperative dynamics when compared to nonreciprocating pairs. Consistent with evolutionary theories of cooperation, reciprocating country pairs exhibit higher levels of stable cooperation and are more likely to punish instances of noncooperation. However, countries in reciprocity-based relationships are also quicker to forgive single acts of noncooperation by eventually returning to previous levels of mutual cooperation. By contrast, nonreciprocating pairs are more likely to exploit each other's cooperation via higher rates of defection. Together, these findings provide the strongest evidence to date that reciprocity is a widespread mechanism for achieving international cooperation.

摘要

互惠原则从微生物层面一直到小群体中互动的人类,都能稳定合作。那么,互惠原则是否也是诸如民族国家等更大规模人类群体之间稳定合作的基础呢?众所周知,进化模型表明,互惠原则可能会成为实现国际合作的一种广泛策略。然而,现有研究仅在少数国家对中发现了由互惠驱动的合作。我们将一种用于检测动态系统中相互影响的新方法应用于一个新的大规模数据集,该数据集以高时间分辨率记录国家间的互动。通过这样做,我们在国际体系中检测到许多国家对之间存在互惠现象,并发现与非互惠国家对相比,这些互惠国家对展现出性质不同的合作动态。与合作的进化理论一致,互惠国家对表现出更高水平的稳定合作,并且更有可能惩罚不合作行为。然而,处于基于互惠关系中的国家也会更快地原谅单次不合作行为,最终恢复到之前的相互合作水平。相比之下,非互惠国家对更有可能通过更高的背叛率来利用对方的合作。总之,这些发现提供了迄今为止最有力的证据,表明互惠是实现国际合作的一种广泛机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/8ec14ed1a5bd/aao5348-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/6faa42f61182/aao5348-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/b824df7b7ef5/aao5348-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/7c169a82a70d/aao5348-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/8ec14ed1a5bd/aao5348-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/6faa42f61182/aao5348-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/b824df7b7ef5/aao5348-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/7c169a82a70d/aao5348-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b6f/5756659/8ec14ed1a5bd/aao5348-F4.jpg

相似文献

1
Detecting reciprocity at a global scale.在全球范围内检测互惠性。
Sci Adv. 2018 Jan 3;4(1):eaao5348. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5348. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Contingent movement and cooperation evolve under generalized reciprocity.偶然的行动与合作在广义互惠的情况下逐渐发展起来。
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 7;272(1578):2259-67. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3248.
3
Coevolution between positive reciprocity, punishment, and partner switching in repeated interactions.重复互动中积极互惠、惩罚与伙伴切换之间的协同进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jun 15;283(1832). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0488.
4
Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms.强互惠、人类合作与社会规范的执行
Hum Nat. 2002 Mar;13(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7.
5
A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.在囚徒困境博弈中,一条简单的直接互惠规则导致了合作与背叛的稳定共存。
J Theor Biol. 2017 May 7;420:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.036. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Contingency in the evolutionary emergence of reciprocal cooperation.互惠合作进化出现中的偶然性。
Am Nat. 2015 Mar;185(3):303-16. doi: 10.1086/679625. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Transient nature of cooperation by pay-it-forward reciprocity.通过“向前支付”互惠实现合作的短暂性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 20;6:19471. doi: 10.1038/srep19471.
8
Onymity promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments.匿名促进社会困境实验中的合作。
Sci Adv. 2017 Mar 29;3(3):e1601444. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601444. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
Revisiting "The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups": continuous reciprocity in the repeated n-person prisoner's dilemma.重新审视“大群体中互惠行为的演化”:重复 n 人囚徒困境中的连续互惠。
J Theor Biol. 2010 May 21;264(2):188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
10
Boundaries of reciprocity: incompleteness of information undermines cooperation.互惠的边界:信息不完整会破坏合作。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Sep;141(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Global Brain Circulation: A Comprehensive Corpus (2000-2024).揭示全球脑循环的时空动态:一个综合语料库(2000 - 2024年)
Sci Data. 2025 Jun 4;12(1):938. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05268-2.
2
Dynamics of cooperation in concurrent games.并发博弈中的合作动态
Nat Commun. 2025 Feb 11;16(1):1524. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56083-7.
3
Risky cascading transitions in international relationships.国际关系中的风险级联转变。

本文引用的文献

1
Think global, act local: Preserving the global commons.全球思考,地方行动:保护全球公域。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 3;6:36079. doi: 10.1038/srep36079.
2
Growing pains for global monitoring of societal events.全球社会事件监测面临的发展难题。
Science. 2016 Sep 30;353(6307):1502-1503. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6758.
3
Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games.人类在双人博弈中表现出一组减少的一致行为表型。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Dec 9;2(1):pgac289. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac289. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Open Debates Conducive for Vaccination Rate Flatlines: A Scoping Review and Convergent Cross Mapping.有助于提高疫苗接种率的公开辩论:范围综述和趋同交叉映射。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:830933. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.830933. eCollection 2022.
5
Global opportunities and challenges for transboundary conservation.跨境保护的全球机遇与挑战。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 May;4(5):694-701. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1160-3. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
Sci Adv. 2016 Aug 5;2(8):e1600451. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600451. eCollection 2016 Aug.
4
MULTILINEAR TENSOR REGRESSION FOR LONGITUDINAL RELATIONAL DATA.用于纵向关系数据的多线性张量回归
Ann Appl Stat. 2015 Sep;9(3):1169-1193. doi: 10.1214/15-AOAS839. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
5
Distinguishing time-delayed causal interactions using convergent cross mapping.使用收敛交叉映射区分时间延迟因果相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 5;5:14750. doi: 10.1038/srep14750.
6
Spatial convergent cross mapping to detect causal relationships from short time series.用于从短时间序列中检测因果关系的空间收敛交叉映射
Ecology. 2015 May;96(5):1174-81. doi: 10.1890/14-1479.1.
7
From extortion to generosity, evolution in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.从敲诈勒索到慷慨大方,重复囚徒困境中的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15348-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306246110. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
8
Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design.公众对全球气候协议的支持取决于制度设计。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110(34):13763-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306374110. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Paying it forward: generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity.施惠于人:广义互惠与慷慨的局限。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):247-54. doi: 10.1037/a0031047. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
10
Detecting causality in complex ecosystems.检测复杂生态系统中的因果关系。
Science. 2012 Oct 26;338(6106):496-500. doi: 10.1126/science.1227079. Epub 2012 Sep 20.