Albanesi Marcello, Nico Andrea, Sinisi Alessandro, Giliberti Lucia, Rossi Maria Pia, Rossini Margherita, Kourtis Georgios, Rucco Anna Simona, Loconte Filomena, Muolo Loredana, Zurlo Marco, Di Bona Danilo, Caiaffa Maria Filomena, Macchia Luigi
1School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari-Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 13, Policlinico, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Unit of Clinical Pathology, Policlinico di Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 13, Policlinico, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Clin Mol Allergy. 2018 Jan 18;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12948-017-0079-y. eCollection 2018.
venom immunotherapy (VIT) is a clinically effective treatment. However, little is known about its long-term clinical efficacy and biological effects. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for VIT efficacy, including reduction of specific IgE and induction of allergen-specific IgG, but the overall picture remains elusive. We investigated VIT clinical efficacy up to 8 years after discontinuation and the kinetics of -specific IgE and IgG. Out of 686 consecutive patients we retrospectively selected and analysed a series of 23 patients with allergy that underwent a 5-year IT course, followed by a prolonged follow-up.
Clinical efficacy of VIT was assessed as number and severity of reactions to re-stinging events. The presence of -specific IgE and IgG was also monitored over time.
During the VIT treatment, patients were protected, reporting no reactions or mild reactions in occasion of re-stinging events. This protection was entirely maintained during the follow-up, up to 8 years. Skin reactivity (reflecting mast cell-bound -specific IgE) and circulating -specific IgE levels declined substantially during VIT. Notably, this reduction was maintained over time during the follow-up. Moreover, all the patients were analysed for IgG. A robust induction of -specific IgG was observed during the VIT course, with a substantial decline during the follow-up.
We conclude that VIT is a clinically effective treatment, which induces long-term protection after discontinuation. The reduction of specific IgE, assessed by skin tests and RAST, closely matches the VIT- induced protection, while the IgG induction seems not to be associated with VIT clinical efficacy in the long term.
毒液免疫疗法(VIT)是一种临床有效的治疗方法。然而,关于其长期临床疗效和生物学效应知之甚少。已经提出了几种机制来解释VIT的疗效,包括特异性IgE的降低和变应原特异性IgG的诱导,但总体情况仍不明确。我们研究了VIT停药后长达8年的临床疗效以及特异性IgE和IgG的动力学。在686例连续患者中,我们回顾性选择并分析了一系列23例患有[过敏名称]的患者,这些患者接受了为期5年的免疫治疗疗程,随后进行了长期随访。
VIT的临床疗效通过对再次蜇刺事件的反应数量和严重程度进行评估。特异性IgE和IgG的存在也随时间进行监测。
在VIT治疗期间,患者受到保护,在再次蜇刺事件时未报告反应或仅有轻微反应。这种保护在随访期间一直保持,长达8年。皮肤反应性(反映与肥大细胞结合的特异性IgE)和循环特异性IgE水平在VIT期间大幅下降。值得注意的是,这种下降在随访期间一直持续。此外,对所有患者进行了IgG分析。在VIT疗程中观察到特异性IgG的强烈诱导,在随访期间大幅下降。
我们得出结论,VIT是一种临床有效的治疗方法,停药后可诱导长期保护。通过皮肤试验和放射变应原吸附试验评估的特异性IgE的降低与VIT诱导的保护密切匹配,而IgG的诱导似乎与VIT的长期临床疗效无关。