Lee Sanghyun, Kwon Seungwoo, Shin Shung J, Kim MinSoo, Park In-Jo
School of Business, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Korea University Business School, Seoul, South Korea.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 17;8:2365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02365. eCollection 2017.
We investigate how two different types of conflict (task conflict and relationship conflict) at two different levels (individual-level and team-level) influence individual team commitment. The analysis was conducted using data we collected from 193 employees in 31 branch offices of a Korean commercial bank. The relationships at multiple levels were tested using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). The results showed that individual-level relationship conflict was negatively related to team commitment while individual-level task conflict was not. In addition, both team-level task and relationship conflict were negatively associated with team commitment. Finally, only team-level relationship conflict significantly moderated the relationship between individual-level relationship conflict and team commitment. We further derive theoretical implications of these findings.
我们研究了两种不同类型的冲突(任务冲突和关系冲突)在两个不同层面(个体层面和团队层面)如何影响个体对团队的承诺。分析是使用我们从一家韩国商业银行31个分支机构的193名员工那里收集的数据进行的。使用分层线性模型(HLM)测试了多个层面的关系。结果表明,个体层面的关系冲突与团队承诺呈负相关,而个体层面的任务冲突则不然。此外,团队层面的任务冲突和关系冲突均与团队承诺呈负相关。最后,只有团队层面的关系冲突显著调节了个体层面的关系冲突与团队承诺之间的关系。我们进一步推导了这些发现的理论意义。