• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

救援人员的工作投入:葡萄牙语版工作投入量表(UWES)的心理测量特性

Work Engagement among Rescue Workers: Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese UWES.

作者信息

Sinval Jorge, Marques-Pinto Alexandra, Queirós Cristina, Marôco João

机构信息

Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 22;8:2229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02229. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02229
PMID:29403403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5786829/
Abstract

Rescue workers have a stressful and risky occupation where being engaged is crucial to face physical and emotional risks in order to help other persons. This study aims to estimate work engagement levels of rescue workers (namely comparing nurses, firefighters, and police officers) and to assess the validity evidence related to the internal structure of the Portuguese versions of the UWES-17 and UWES-9, namely, dimensionality, measurement invariance between occupational groups, and reliability of the scores. To evaluate the dimensionality, we compared the fit of the three-factor model with the fit of a second-order model. A Portuguese version of the instrument was applied to a convenience sample of 3,887 rescue workers (50% nurses, 39% firefighters, and 11% police officers). Work engagement levels were moderate to high, with firefighters being the highest and nurses being the lowest engaged. Psychometric properties were evaluated in the three-factor original structure revealing acceptable fit to the data in the UWES-17, although the UWES-9 had better psychometric properties. Given the observed statistically significant correlations between the three original factors, we proposed a 2 hierarchal structure that we named work engagement. The UWES-9 first-order model obtained full uniqueness measurement invariance, and the second-order model obtained partial (metric) second-order invariance.

摘要

救援人员从事着压力大且危险的职业,全身心投入对于他们面对身体和情感上的风险以帮助他人至关重要。本研究旨在估计救援人员(即护士、消防员和警察)的工作投入水平,并评估与葡萄牙语版UWES - 17和UWES - 9内部结构相关的效度证据,即维度、职业群体间的测量不变性以及分数的可靠性。为了评估维度,我们将三因素模型的拟合度与二阶模型的拟合度进行了比较。该工具的葡萄牙语版本应用于3887名救援人员的便利样本(50%为护士,39%为消防员,11%为警察)。工作投入水平为中等至高,其中消防员的投入度最高,护士的投入度最低。在三因素原始结构中评估了心理测量特性,结果显示UWES - 17对数据的拟合度尚可,尽管UWES - 9具有更好的心理测量特性。鉴于观察到的三个原始因素之间具有统计学意义的相关性,我们提出了一种二级层次结构,我们将其命名为工作投入。UWES - 9一阶模型获得了完全独特性测量不变性,二阶模型获得了部分(度量)二阶不变性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d25e/5786829/257ce8199fd7/fpsyg-08-02229-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d25e/5786829/1818c0d36921/fpsyg-08-02229-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d25e/5786829/257ce8199fd7/fpsyg-08-02229-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d25e/5786829/1818c0d36921/fpsyg-08-02229-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d25e/5786829/257ce8199fd7/fpsyg-08-02229-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Work Engagement among Rescue Workers: Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese UWES.救援人员的工作投入:葡萄牙语版工作投入量表(UWES)的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 22;8:2229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02229. eCollection 2017.
2
Brazil-Portugal Transcultural Adaptation of the UWES-9: Internal Consistency, Dimensionality, and Measurement Invariance.《工作投入量表-9项版的巴西-葡萄牙跨文化调适:内部一致性、维度性和测量不变性》
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00353. eCollection 2018.
3
Work Engagement in Serbia: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES).塞尔维亚的工作投入:乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)塞尔维亚语版的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 16;8:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799. eCollection 2017.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a Sample of Active Health Care Professionals in Spain.西班牙在职医护人员样本中乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-9)的心理测量特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Nov 30;15:3461-3472. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S387242. eCollection 2022.
5
The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9S): Factorial Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance in a Chilean Sample of Undergraduate University Students.乌得勒支大学生工作投入量表(UWES-9S):智利本科大学生样本中的因子效度、信度和测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 30;10:1017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01017. eCollection 2019.
6
Measuring engagement at work: validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.工作投入度的测量:《乌德勒支工作投入量表》中文版的验证。
Int J Behav Med. 2012 Sep;19(3):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6.
7
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.越南语版 9 项工作投入量表的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157.
8
[Measuring the positive dimensions among health care workers: a contribution to the Italian validation of the UWES--Utrecht Work Engagement Scale].[衡量医护人员的积极维度:对UWES(乌得勒支工作投入量表)意大利语版验证的贡献]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2008 Jan-Mar;30(1 Suppl A):A111-9.
9
Measuring work engagement in Thailand: development and validation testing of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Thai version (UWES-TH).测量泰国的工作投入:泰国版乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-TH)的开发和验证测试。
Ind Health. 2024 Jun 1;62(3):182-194. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2023-0017. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
10
Psychometric Properties of Spanish Version Student Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-S-9) in High-school Students.高中生西班牙语版学生乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-S-9)的心理测量特性。
Span J Psychol. 2019 May 13;22:E21. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.25.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of work-family conflict on work engagement among female university teachers: Evidence from China.工作-家庭冲突对高校女教师工作投入的影响:来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0319785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319785. eCollection 2025.
2
Job satisfaction and social identification among paramedics in southern Poland.波兰南部护理人员的工作满意度和社会认同感。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 26;12:1422933. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1422933. eCollection 2024.
3
Psychometric evaluation of PHQ-9 and GAD-7 among community health volunteers and nurses/midwives in Kenya following a nation-wide telephonic survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement invariance, the lack thereof, and modeling change.测量不变性、缺乏测量不变性和模型变化。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1735-1743. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1673-7. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
2
Is a Transdisciplinary Theory of Engagement in Organized Settings Possible? A Concept Analysis of the Literature on Employee Engagement, Consumer Engagement and Patient Engagement.是否有可能形成一种关于在有组织环境中参与的跨学科理论?对员工参与、消费者参与和患者参与相关文献的概念分析。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 6;8:872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00872. eCollection 2017.
3
The Association of Employee Engagement at Work With Health Risks and Presenteeism.
在肯尼亚全国范围内进行电话调查后,对社区卫生志愿者以及护士/助产士进行患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7(GAD-7)的心理测量评估。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 30;14:1123839. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1123839. eCollection 2023.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a Sample of Active Health Care Professionals in Spain.西班牙在职医护人员样本中乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-9)的心理测量特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Nov 30;15:3461-3472. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S387242. eCollection 2022.
5
Cognitive Strategies and Textual Genres in the Teaching and Evaluation of Advanced Reading Comprehension (ARC).高级阅读理解教学与评估中的认知策略和文本体裁
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:723281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723281. eCollection 2021.
6
Work engagement and associated factors among dental nurses in China.中国牙科护士的工作投入及相关因素。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01766-y.
7
Model of Organizational Commitment Applied to Health Management Systems.组织承诺模型在健康管理系统中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 23;18(9):4496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094496.
8
Development of the Referee Shared Mental Models Measure (RSMMM).裁判共享心智模型量表(RSMMM)的开发。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 19;11:550271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550271. eCollection 2020.
9
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.越南语版 9 项工作投入量表的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157.
10
Short Index of Job Satisfaction: Validity evidence from Portugal and Brazil.简短工作满意度指数:来自葡萄牙和巴西的效度证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 14;15(4):e0231474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231474. eCollection 2020.
工作中员工敬业度与健康风险和出勤主义的关联。
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct;59(10):988-992. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001108.
4
How are changes in exposure to job demands and job resources related to burnout and engagement? A longitudinal study among Chinese nurses and police officers.工作要求和工作资源的变化如何与倦怠和投入相关?一项针对中国护士和警察的纵向研究。
Stress Health. 2017 Dec;33(5):631-644. doi: 10.1002/smi.2750. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
5
Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.我们是否都认同如何衡量工作投入度?作为一种标准测量工具的乌得勒支工作投入量表的因素效度——一项文献综述。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Mar 30;30(2):161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
6
Predictors of burnout, work engagement and nurse reported job outcomes and quality of care: a mixed method study.职业倦怠、工作投入的预测因素以及护士报告的工作成果和护理质量:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2017 Jan 18;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0200-4. eCollection 2017.
7
Improving measurement-invariance assessments: correcting entrenched testing deficiencies.改进测量不变性评估:纠正根深蒂固的测试缺陷。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0230-3.
8
Burnout Subtypes and Absence of Self-Compassion in Primary Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.基层医疗保健专业人员的职业倦怠亚型与缺乏自我同情:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0157499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157499. eCollection 2016.
9
Resilience, post-traumatic growth, and work engagement among health care professionals after the Great East Japan Earthquake: A 4-year prospective follow-up study.东日本大地震后医护人员的心理韧性、创伤后成长与工作投入:一项为期4年的前瞻性随访研究。
J Occup Health. 2016 Jul 22;58(4):347-53. doi: 10.1539/joh.16-0002-OA. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
10
Shared Governance and Work Engagement in Emergency Nurses.急诊护士的共同治理与工作投入
J Emerg Nurs. 2016 Jul;42(4):325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Mar 11.