Suppr超能文献

忽视辅助毒性会歪曲商业农药的安全性概况。

Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides.

作者信息

Mesnage Robin, Antoniou Michael N

机构信息

Gene Expression and Therapy Group, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2018 Jan 22;5:361. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00361. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Commercial formulations of pesticides are invariably not single ingredients. Instead they are cocktails of chemicals, composed of a designated pesticidal "active principle" and "other ingredients," with the latter collectively also known as "adjuvants." These include surfactants, antifoaming agents, dyes, etc. Some adjuvants are added to influence the absorption and stability of the active principle and thus promote its pesticidal action. Currently, the health risk assessment of pesticides in the European Union and in the United States focuses almost exclusively on the stated active principle. Nonetheless, adjuvants can also be toxic in their own right with numerous negative health effects having been reported in humans and on the environment. Despite the known toxicity of adjuvants, they are regulated differently from active principles, with their toxic effects being generally ignored. Adjuvants are not subject to an acceptable daily intake, and they are not included in the health risk assessment of dietary exposures to pesticide residues. Here, we illustrate this gap in risk assessment by reference to glyphosate, the most used pesticide active ingredient. We also investigate the case of neonicotinoid insecticides, which are strongly suspected to be involved in bee and bumblebee colony collapse disorder. Authors of studies sometimes use the name of the active principle (for example glyphosate) when they are testing a commercial formulation containing multiple (active principle plus adjuvant) ingredients. This results in confusion in the scientific literature and within regulatory circles and leads to a misrepresentation of the safety profile of commercial pesticides. Urgent action is needed to lift the veil on the presence of adjuvants in food and human bodily fluids, as well as in the environment (such as in air, water, and soil) and to characterize their toxicological properties. This must be accompanied by regulatory precautionary measures to protect the environment and general human population from some toxic adjuvants that are currently missing from risk assessments.

摘要

农药的商业配方从来都不是单一成分。相反,它们是化学物质的混合物,由指定的农药“活性成分”和“其他成分”组成,后者统称为“助剂”。这些助剂包括表面活性剂、消泡剂、染料等。添加一些助剂是为了影响活性成分的吸收和稳定性,从而增强其杀虫作用。目前,欧盟和美国对农药的健康风险评估几乎完全集中在规定的活性成分上。然而,助剂本身也可能有毒,已有大量关于其对人类健康和环境产生负面影响的报道。尽管已知助剂有毒,但它们与活性成分的监管方式不同,其毒性影响通常被忽视。助剂没有每日可接受摄入量标准,也不包括在膳食中农药残留的健康风险评估范围内。在此,我们以最常用的农药活性成分草甘膦为例来说明风险评估中的这一差距。我们还研究了新烟碱类杀虫剂的情况,人们强烈怀疑这类杀虫剂与蜜蜂和大黄蜂蜂群崩溃失调有关。研究作者在测试含有多种(活性成分加助剂)成分的商业配方时,有时会使用活性成分的名称(例如草甘膦)。这在科学文献和监管圈子中造成了混乱,导致对商业农药安全概况的错误表述。迫切需要采取行动,揭开食品、人体体液以及环境(如空气、水和土壤)中助剂存在的面纱,并确定其毒理学特性。与此同时,必须采取监管预防措施,以保护环境和普通人群免受目前风险评估中缺失的一些有毒助剂的危害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e646/5786549/6df934ada5c7/fpubh-05-00361-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验