Suppr超能文献

自闭症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童 2 岁时的目标预测:一项眼动追踪研究。

Goal prediction in 2-year-old children with and without autism spectrum disorder: An eye-tracking study.

机构信息

DePaul University, Chicago, IL.

University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Autism Res. 2018 Jun;11(6):870-882. doi: 10.1002/aur.1936. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study examined the predictive reasoning abilities of typically developing (TD) infants and 2-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in an eye-tracking paradigm. Participants watched a video of a goal-directed action in which a human actor reached for and grasped one of two objects. At test, the objects switched locations. Across these events, we measured: visual anticipation of the action outcome with kinematic cues (i.e., a completed reaching behavior); goal prediction of the action outcome without kinematic cues (i.e., an incomplete reach); and latencies to generate predictions across these two tasks. Results revealed similarities in action anticipation across groups when trajectory information regarding the intended goal was present; however, when predicting the goal without kinematic cues, developmental and diagnostic differences became evident. Younger TD children generated goal-based visual predictions, whereas older TD children were not systematic in their visual predictions. In contrast to both TD groups, children with ASD generated location-based predictions, suggesting that their visual predictions may reflect visuomotor perseveration. Together, these results suggest differences in early predictive reasoning abilities. Autism Res 2018, 11: 870-882. © 2018 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

LAY SUMMARY

The current study examines the ability to generate visual predictions regarding other people's goal-directed actions, specifically reaching and grasping an object, in infants and children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Results showed no differences in abilities when movement information about a person's goal was evident; however, differences were evident across age and clinical diagnoses when relying on previous knowledge to generate a visual prediction.

摘要

本研究使用眼动追踪范式,考察了正常发育(TD)婴儿和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童 2 岁儿童的预测推理能力。参与者观看了一段目标导向动作的视频,视频中一个人类演员伸手去抓两个物体中的一个。在测试中,物体的位置发生了变化。在这些事件中,我们测量了:具有运动学线索的动作结果的视觉预期(即完成的伸手行为);没有运动学线索的动作结果的目标预测(即未完成的伸手);以及在这两个任务中生成预测的潜伏期。结果表明,当存在有关目标的轨迹信息时,两组在动作预期方面存在相似性;但是,当在没有运动学线索的情况下预测目标时,就会出现发育和诊断差异。年幼的 TD 儿童产生基于目标的视觉预测,而年长的 TD 儿童的视觉预测则没有系统。与 TD 组相比,ASD 儿童产生基于位置的预测,这表明他们的视觉预测可能反映了视觉运动的持续。这些结果表明,早期预测推理能力存在差异。自闭症研究 2018,11:870-882。©2018 自闭症国际研究协会,Wiley 期刊,公司。

要点总结

本研究考察了在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和正常发育(TD)婴儿和儿童中,生成有关他人目标导向动作(即伸手抓物)的视觉预测的能力。当有关于目标的运动信息时,没有发现能力上的差异;但是,当依赖先前的知识来生成视觉预测时,在年龄和临床诊断方面存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfe4/6026049/9bc2f7fddd03/nihms962795f1.jpg

相似文献

10
Faster eye movements in children with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的眼球运动更快。
Autism Res. 2019 Feb;12(2):212-224. doi: 10.1002/aur.2054. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Event perception and event memory in real-world experience.现实世界体验中的事件感知与事件记忆。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2024 Nov;3(11):754-766. doi: 10.1038/s44159-024-00367-0. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Linguistic Prediction in Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的语言预测
Brain Sci. 2025 Feb 10;15(2):175. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020175.

本文引用的文献

4
Action Experience Changes Attention to Kinematic Cues.动作体验会改变对运动线索的注意力。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 15;7:19. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00019. eCollection 2016.
5
Eye Movements During Action Observation.动作观察期间的眼球运动
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):591-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691615589103.
7
When do infants begin to follow a point?婴儿何时开始注视一个指示点?
Dev Psychol. 2014 Aug;50(8):2036-48. doi: 10.1037/a0037152. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
9
The emergence of intention attribution in infancy.婴儿期意图归因的出现。
Psychol Learn Motiv. 2009;51:187-222. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51006-7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验