Suppr超能文献

使用音素监测任务来检查口吃和不口吃成年人的词汇通达情况。

Use of a phoneme monitoring task to examine lexical access in adults who do and do not stutter.

作者信息

Howell Timothy A, Bernstein Ratner Nan

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, 0100 Samuel J. LeFrak Hall, 7251 Preinkert Dr., College Park, MD 20742, United States.

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, 0100 Samuel J. LeFrak Hall, 7251 Preinkert Dr., College Park, MD 20742, United States.

出版信息

J Fluency Disord. 2018 Sep;57:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

Abstract

Previous work has postulated that a deficit in lexicalization may be an underlying cause of a stuttering disorder (Prins, Main, & Wampler, 1997; Wingate, 1988). This study investigates the time course of lexicalization of nouns and verbs in adults who stutter. A generalized phoneme monitoring (PM) paradigm was used. Adults who stutter (AWS) and typically-fluent peers both showed an expected effect of word class (verbs yielded slower and less accurate monitoring than nouns), as well as phoneme position (word medial/final phonemes yielded slower and less accurate monitoring than word initial phonemes). However, AWS had considerably more difficulty when targets to be monitored were embedded in the medial position. A negative correlation between speed and accuracy was found in typically fluent adults, but not in AWS. AWS also scored nonsignificantly more poorly on an experimental language task. Because of the additional difficulty noted in AWS with word-medial targets, our results provide evidence of phonological encoding differences between the two groups. Expanded use of the PM paradigm is recommended for the exploration of additional aspects of language processing in people who stutter.

摘要

先前的研究推测,词汇化缺陷可能是口吃障碍的一个潜在原因(普林斯、梅因和万普勒,1997年;温盖特,1988年)。本研究调查了口吃成年人名词和动词词汇化的时间进程。采用了广义音素监测(PM)范式。口吃成年人(AWS)和典型流利的同龄人都表现出预期的词类效应(动词的监测速度比名词慢且准确性低)以及音素位置效应(词中/词尾音素的监测速度比词首音素慢且准确性低)。然而,当要监测的目标嵌入词中位置时,AWS遇到的困难要大得多。在典型流利的成年人中发现了速度与准确性之间的负相关,但在AWS中未发现。AWS在一项实验性语言任务中的得分也略低,但无显著差异。由于AWS在词中目标方面存在额外困难,我们的结果提供了两组之间语音编码差异的证据。建议扩大使用PM范式,以探索口吃者语言处理的其他方面。

相似文献

5
Metrical Encoding in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter.有口吃和无口吃成年人的韵律编码
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):601-21. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0111.
8
Linguistic factors and stuttering in Nepali speaking adults who stutter.尼泊尔语口吃者的语言因素和口吃。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2023 Mar 4;37(3):258-271. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2022.2049880. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
9
Phoneme monitoring in silent naming and perception in adults who stutter.口吃成年人在无声命名和感知中的音素监测
J Fluency Disord. 2006;31(4):284-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
10
Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter.不口吃者和口吃者的非词重复和音位省略。
J Fluency Disord. 2012 Sep;37(3):188-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Metrical Encoding in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter.有口吃和无口吃成年人的韵律编码
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):601-21. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0111.
9
Early childhood stuttering and electrophysiological indices of language processing.儿童早期口吃与语言处理的电生理学指标。
J Fluency Disord. 2013 Jun;38(2):206-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
10
A preliminary investigation of phonological encoding skills in children who stutter.口吃儿童语音编码技能的初步研究。
J Fluency Disord. 2013 Mar;38(1):45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验