Dombrowski Malcolm E, Rynearson Bryan, LeVasseur Clarissa, Adgate Zach, Donaldson William F, Lee Joon Y, Aiyangar Ameet, Anderst William J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Biodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, 3820 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
EMPA (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Research), Mechanical Systems Engineering (Lab 304), Ueberlandstrasse 129, 8400, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J. 2018 Apr;27(4):752-762. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5489-0. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) in the setting of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is commonly treated with spinal fusion in addition to decompression with laminectomy. However, recent studies have shown similar clinical outcomes after decompression alone, suggesting that a subset of DS patients may not require spinal fusion. Identification of dynamic instability could prove useful for predicting which patients are at higher risk of post-laminectomy destabilization necessitating fusion. The goal of this study was to determine if static clinical radiographs adequately characterize dynamic instability in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and to compare the rotational and translational kinematics in vivo during continuous dynamic flexion activity in DS versus asymptomatic age-matched controls.
Seven patients with symptomatic single level lumbar DS (6 M, 1 F; 66 ± 5.0 years) and seven age-matched asymptomatic controls (5 M, 2 F age 63.9 ± 6.4 years) underwent biplane radiographic imaging during continuous torso flexion. A volumetric model-based tracking system was used to track each vertebra in the radiographic images using subject-specific 3D bone models from high-resolution computed tomography (CT). In vivo continuous dynamic sagittal rotation (flexion/extension) and AP translation (slip) were calculated and compared to clinical measures of intervertebral flexion/extension and AP translation obtained from standard lateral flexion/extension radiographs.
Static clinical radiographs underestimate the degree of AP translation seen on dynamic in vivo imaging (1.0 vs 3.1 mm; p = 0.03). DS patients demonstrated three primary motion patterns compared to a single kinematic pattern in asymptomatic controls when analyzing continuous dynamic in vivo imaging. 3/7 (42%) of patients with DS demonstrated aberrant mid-range motion.
Continuous in vivo dynamic imaging in DS reveals a spectrum of aberrant motion with significantly greater kinematic heterogeneity than previously realized that is not readily seen on current clinical imaging.
Level V data These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
症状性腰椎管狭窄症合并退行性腰椎滑脱(DS)通常采用椎板切除减压术联合脊柱融合术治疗。然而,近期研究表明单纯减压术后的临床效果相似,这表明部分DS患者可能不需要脊柱融合术。识别动态不稳定对于预测哪些患者在椎板切除术后发生不稳定而需要融合的风险较高可能有用。本研究的目的是确定静态临床X线片能否充分表征腰椎退行性腰椎滑脱(DS)患者的动态不稳定,并比较DS患者与年龄匹配的无症状对照者在连续动态屈曲活动期间的体内旋转和平移运动学。
7例有症状的单节段腰椎DS患者(6例男性,1例女性;年龄66±5.0岁)和7例年龄匹配的无症状对照者(5例男性,2例女性;年龄63.9±6.4岁)在连续躯干屈曲期间接受双平面X线成像。使用基于体积模型的跟踪系统,利用来自高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT)的个体特异性3D骨模型跟踪X线图像中的每个椎体。计算体内连续动态矢状面旋转(屈伸)和前后平移(滑脱),并与从标准侧位屈伸X线片获得的椎间屈伸和前后平移的临床测量值进行比较。
静态临床X线片低估了动态体内成像中观察到的前后平移程度(1.0 vs 3.1mm;p = 0.03)。在分析连续动态体内成像时,与无症状对照者的单一运动学模式相比,DS患者表现出三种主要运动模式。3/7(42%)的DS患者表现出异常的中间范围运动。
DS患者的连续体内动态成像显示出一系列异常运动,其运动学异质性明显大于先前认识到的,在当前临床成像中不易看到。
V级数据 这些幻灯片可在电子补充材料中获取。